Originally posted on NESN.com  |  Last updated 11/23/12
Forget what you know about the lore of the Boston Red Sox’ 2000s success. Even in the movie Moneyball, itself, the film’s post script contains a note that Boston won its 2004 world championship on the back of Billy Beane-like principles. Likewise, Theo Epstein has been trumpeted as a computer-geek wonderboy who played the Red Sox like a deck of cards and won two high-stakes hands in 2004 and 2007. This is mostly false. With players like J.D. Drew and Kevin Youkilis at the forefront, the 2007 team was closer to a Moneyball-eque squad. However, both championships were more the result of the Red Sox’ ability to buy premium, high-price talent like Pedro Martinez, Curt Schilling, Manny Ramirez and Josh Beckett. To be fair, a few shrewd acquisitions (David Ortiz, Jason Varitek) and developing talented players via the farm system (Dustin Pedroia, Jonathan Papelbon, Youkilis) had a hand in that success, as well. And while the Red Sox will always be a hybrid of high-price talent and minor league development, the signing of Jonny Gomes to a two-year, $10 million contract is a strong indication that the team is closer than ever to the Moneyball model. Gomes may not be the splashy signing Red Sox Nation had hoped for, but what he may well end up being is one of the best bargains on the free agent market. Off the bat, Gomes’ multifaceted downside is obvious. For one, he’s limited to left field, and a below-average defender at best. Fenway Park, of course, limits the liability in terms of left fielders and the amount of ground they have to cover, but Gomes played more as a designated hitter in 2012 with the Athletics than he did in the outfield. The other downside to Gomes is that he is best deployed as a platoon option. Gomes had a .974 OPS in 196 plate appearances against left-handed pitchers in 2012, but a .715 mark in 137 plate appearances against right-handers. All that being said, there are a lot of things that Gomes does well which can really help the Red Sox. The first is the old cry of the Moneyball philosophy: he gets on base. Gomes’ batting average doesn’t look pretty, but his .334 on-base percentage and .455 slugging percentage are more than just respectable — they’re the mark of an offensive plus who’s now moving to a haven for right-handed hitters. Speaking of Fenway Park, Gomes has had a fair sample size of at-bats throughout his career, and the numbers are about in line with his career averages. Gomes has started 24 games at Fenway, and put up a .783 OPS, including three home runs. Considering he faced some stacked Red Sox rotations during his years with the Devil Rays, those numbers a pretty fair for the ballpark. Either way, Gomes, though turning 32 on Thursday, could prove to be a bargain for the Red Sox, and he doesn’t figure to be much of a risk. The Sox know what kind of player they’re getting and aren’t likely asking him to be an everyday left fielder. However, if he can continue to do the things the Red Sox like about him — getting on base and hitting right-handed pitching with power — then he could prove to be very valuable as the Red Sox retool their roster. The inevitable questions then become what this means for the rest of the Red Sox roster and offseason. The answer is that it definitely doesn’t preclude the Red Sox from going after any of the other free agent outfielders out there, namely Cody Ross and Josh Hamilton. Hamilton may be unlikely for reasons beyond the presence of Gomes, but it does give the Red Sox some insurance in case the market for Ross inflates beyond what Boston sees as reasonable — but the Red Sox still do have a hole in right field. But more to the point, Gomes’ production in 2012 wasn’t far off Ross’. But the Gomes signing is far more interesting for what it may mean for the Red Sox, philosophically. Just to reiterate it, Boston will always have a certain amount of high-price talent on its roster, but what the Gomes signing does is reinforce that the Red Sox are committed to following through on the principles that general manager Ben Cherington has always espoused: discipline and financial flexibility. Bringing in Gomes is not the splashy move that may or may not be coming. But it’s the kind of move that allows the team to remain competitive while continuing to hunt down those splashy signings — but opportunistically, rather than taking on contracts the team isn’t comfortable with. It’s a sign of the realities of the luxury-tax era and that even the deep-pocketed Red Sox have financial constraints, so the signing must be understood in this kind of context. But given the realities of overhauling a roster heading into 2013, it could be a very Shrewd move for the Red Sox. Photo via Flickr/Keith Allison

This article first appeared on NESN.com and was syndicated with permission.

GET THE YARDBARKER APP:
Ios_download En_app_rgb_wo_45
MORE FROM YARDBARKER

Kevin Love responds to Draymond Green’s ‘annihilation’ trash talk

Spike Lee deletes Instagram post saying Kaepernick signed with Seattle

Errol Spence is the real deal, takes down Kell Brook

Indians reveal Frank Robinson statue at Progressive Field

Report: Jerry West considered rejoining the Lakers before they hired Magic Johnson

LIKE WHAT YOU SEE?
GET THE DAILY NEWSLETTER:

The NHL is thinking about hosting an outdoor game in Nashville

Michael Vick in talks to retire with Falcons

Hall of Fame pitcher and former U.S. Senator Jim Bunning passes away at 85

Roger Goodell to speak at Rams event, tickets start at $550

Ohio State hails itself as the ‘fastest team in college football’

Get a look at Shia LeBeouf as John McEnroe in Borg/McEnroe movie trailer

Journey to the Stanley Cup Final: Pittsburgh Penguins

Best of Yardbarker: Ladies and gentlemen, start your engines

The 'More like Whiffer, Texas Ranger...amirite?' quiz

The Rewind: Vince Carter's graduation day celebration that wasn't

Manu Ginobili gave life to the San Antonio Spurs

Stanley Cup Final: A David vs. Goliath matchup that's not as lopsided as it may appear

Why the Indianapolis 500 is called 'the greatest spectacle in racing'

The 10 best sports docs available for streaming

Box Score 5/26: Bring on the Finals

Why wait? Our too soon Cavaliers-Warriors NBA Finals preview

Kicking It: East is East, and West is West

Three Up, Three Down: Some surprises way out (NL) West

MLB News
Delivered to your inbox
You'll also receive Yardbarker's daily Top 10, featuring the best sports stories from around the web. Customize your newsletter to get articles on your favorite sports and teams. And the best part? It's free!

By clicking "Sign Me Up", you have read and agreed to the Fox Sports Digital Privacy Policy and Terms of Use. You can opt out at any time. For more information, please see our Privacy Policy.
the YARDBARKER app
Get it now!
Ios_download En_app_rgb_wo_45

Journey to the Stanley Cup Final: Pittsburgh Penguins

Best of Yardbarker: Ladies and gentlemen, start your engines

The 'More like Whiffer, Texas Ranger...amirite?' quiz

Stanley Cup Final: A David vs. Goliath matchup that's not as lopsided as it may appear

Manu Ginobili gave life to the San Antonio Spurs

The Rewind: Vince Carter's graduation day celebration that wasn't

The 10 best sports docs available for streaming

Kicking It: East is East, and West is West

Three Up, Three Down: Some surprises way out (NL) West

The 'Let's go to the videotape!' quiz

Today's Best Stuff
For Publishers
Company Info
Help
Follow Yardbarker