Originally posted on Taking Bad Schotz  |  Last updated 11/4/12
Last offseason David Ortiz was visibly upset about the nature of his contract negotiations with the Red Sox.  His asking price, a two-year contract at the same pay that he was currently making, was apparently more than the Red Sox were willing to pay.  The two sides eventually settled on a one-year contract worth $14.57 million.  Ortiz called the negotiations both embarrassing and humiliating.  The 2012 season gave Ortiz the chance to prove that he was worth the two year contract that he felt he deserved, and that is exactly what he did.  Ortiz triple slashed .318/.415/.611, good for a four digit OPS.  His 169 wRC+ was first among designated hitters with at least 100 plate appearances.  This led to a three-win season despite being limited to only 383 plate appearances due to an Achilles injury. via tedsarmy.com The Red Sox responded to this showing by doing what they should have done a year ago, sign Ortiz to a two-year deal.  The contract, worth $26 million over those two years, looks like a good deal for both sides.  Ortiz got the job security he wanted, and the Red Sox retained their best offensive player for a below-market-level price.  At $13 million a season, assuming teams will continue to pay about $5-6 million per win this offseason, Ortiz is being paid like a 2.5 win player.  In the last three seasons, he has averaged around 3.2 WAR, and that includes last season in which he lost a significant amount of time to injury, so there should be some surplus value in this contract for the Sox. Some may point to Ortiz’s age –he will turn 37 later this month– and his recent injury history to suggest that this was a risky signing for a team in such a state of flux.  While the risk of injury will always be a factor when evaluating contracts, Ortiz has registered over 600 plate appearances in three of his last four seasons; so as long as there are no lasting issues with the Achilles injury, Ortiz should come with no more injury risk than the average player, perhaps even less considering he never plays in the field.  As far as aging is concerned, he has actually improved his wRC+ in each of the last three seasons.  Part of this can be attributed to his decreasing strike out rate.  His K% dropped from 23.9% to 13.7% in 2011, and to 13.3% in 2012.  It is often the case that when a player’s K% goes down, his power numbers also drop.  Ortiz, however, has put up ISO rates of .246 and .293 in his last two seasons.  He may be getting old, but his stats aren’t showing it. There were legitimate questions coming into the offseason regarding whether Ortiz would be in a Red Sox uniform next year.  He seemed unhappy with their handling of his contract last offseason, and let’s not forget, the Red Sox were awful in 2012.  But it was clear that Ortiz wanted to remain in Boston, and the Red Sox didn’t want to lose a franchise icon following such a disappointing season.  In the end, the two sides agreed on a mutually beneficial contract that will see Ortiz play at least two more seasons in Fenway Park.  It would’ve been unfortunate had it ended up any other way. -Albright
GET THE YARDBARKER APP:
Ios_download En_app_rgb_wo_45
MORE FROM YARDBARKER

The Warriors just trucked the Blazers with 8 threes, 45 points in the first quarter

Serena Williams fires back at Ilie Nastase’s racist comment about her child

Magic Johnson will represent the Lakers at NBA Draft Lottery

Red Sox pitcher Matt Barnes suspended, fined for throwing at Manny Machado

Jerry Jones happy Tony Romo isn’t playing for another NFL team

LIKE WHAT YOU SEE?
GET THE DAILY NEWSLETTER:

George told teammates he has dreamed of playing for Lakers?

Westbrook takes shot at Rockets for laughing at Roberson

Report: Adrian Peterson, Saints 'closing in on a deal'

Richard Sherman shows up for voluntary workouts

Jabrill Peppers the latest star to test positive for diluted sample

NFL draft prospect loses father to accidental shooting

NBA Weekend Awards: Who takes home the Wilt Chamberlain Trophy?

Everything you need for the 2017 NFL Draft

Where it went wrong: Stanley Cup Playoffs Round 1 exits

20 of the best NFL Draft red carpet looks

Getaway Day: Wild, wacky and weird week in MLB (and that's just the injuries)

11 names you need to know for the NFL Draft

Most inspirational sports movies, series and docs available for streaming

The 10 best sports docs available for streaming

The 'It's not good to play the King' quiz

Best of Yardbarker: David Fizdale and the Grizzlies won't go down quietly

Three Up, Three Down: Home run hitters are heating up

The 'Even the Browns can't mess this one up' quiz

MLB News
Delivered to your inbox
You'll also receive Yardbarker's daily Top 10, featuring the best sports stories from around the web. Customize your newsletter to get articles on your favorite sports and teams. And the best part? It's free!

By clicking "Sign Me Up", you have read and agreed to the Fox Sports Digital Privacy Policy and Terms of Use. You can opt out at any time. For more information, please see our Privacy Policy.
the YARDBARKER app
Get it now!
Ios_download En_app_rgb_wo_45

NBA Weekend Awards: Who takes home the Wilt Chamberlain Trophy?

Everything you need for the 2017 NFL Draft

Where it went wrong: Stanley Cup Playoffs Round 1 exits

Getaway Day: Wild, wacky and weird week in MLB

11 names you need to know for the NFL Draft

Most inspirational sports movies, series and docs available for streaming

The 10 best sports docs available for streaming

The 'It's not good to play the King' quiz

Three Up, Three Down: Home run hitters are heating up

The 'Even the Browns can't mess this one up' quiz

Today's Best Stuff
For Publishers
Company Info
Help
Follow Yardbarker