Trading Albert Pujols: Absurd or Plausible?

I know I should be shot for even thinking, yet alone suggesting, that the St. Louis Cardinals should trade Albert Pujols. Shoot me later, please. I have some explaining to do. I am not implying, saying, inferring, or suggesting that the Cardinals trade Pujols now. Why should they? Pujols is a Cardinal for 2010, without a doubt. What I am saying is that the Cardinals should consider trading Pujols after 2010 if he says he wants to test the open market. If Pujols is open to an extension, it needs to get done. When it gets done, throw this suggestion out the window. If Pujols says that he wants to test the free agent market, the Cardinals should consider dealing Pujols. Why? Think of the suitors. If the Cardinals say "Pujols" and "trade" in the same sentence, even if they aren't talking about Pujols being traded, they get 15 calls. Think about if they actually say, "We are open to a deal for Albert Pujols." Can you say flood? Boston Red So...