Originally written on Baseball Professor  |  Last updated 1/11/13

Expectations are low in Red Sox Nation. Last season Boston stumbled to a 69-win season, the team’s lowest win total since in a non-strike-shortened season since going 62-100 in 1965. Actually, “stumbled” doesn’t even begin to describe the utter nightmare that 2012 was. Flubbed? Blundered? Imploded? All of those more accurately convey the complete failure of a season the Red Sox had. In the wake of a third straight year without Fenway opening for game number 82 of the season on a crisp October evening, the Red Sox made some serious club-wide changes. Bobby Valentine is gone, John Farrell is in. The team’s medical staff is undergoing a complete face-lift after years of injury mismanagement, most notable of which surrounds the always ailing, yet immensely talented, Jacoby Ellsbury. David Ortiz is back after signing the two-year contract he’s been waiting years for, and the team has decided to forego any free agent whose contract demands extend past 2015. After all the team has done — and not done — this offseason, the opinion of almost every Sox fan in the city inevitably falls into one of two categories: “They had all that free money after the Dodgers bailed them out, and they were too afraid to spend it. Shane Victorino and Ryan Dempster? Those guys are washed up! Looks like we’re in for another October miss.” “Man, we really got a ‘Get Out of Jail Free’ card when the Dodgers agreed to take almost a quarter-billion dollars off our hands. The team’s taking the right approach this offseason. They just have to sit back and spend wisely. I mean, yeah, that’ll mean a few more disappointing seasons, but in three years our prospects should be ready and we can contend again.” Well, what if I told you that the often criticized, yet shrewd moves made this offseason by Red Sox GM Ben Cherington have actually put the team in position to make the playoffs in 2013? Seriously, it’s not that far-fetched. How many wins will it take to make the playoffs? With the two-Wild Card format, the bar for postseason qualification has been lowered. Last year the Orioles and Rangers were the American League’s two wild card teams, and each won 93 games. In 2011 the Rays won the wild card with 91 wins, and had there been two wild card teams that year the Angels would have gotten in with 86. In 2010 the White Sox were the AL’s fifth-best team with 88 wins. Obviously playoff races would have changed if the rules during those seasons were the same as 2012, but would the 86-win Angels and the 88-win White Sox have all of a sudden transformed into 95-win juggernauts? Doubtful. And what about 2013′s projected playoff contenders? Sorry Orioles fans, but your team was way too lucky in one-run games and didn’t add any substantial pieces this offseason. You’re out. The White Sox won 85 games last year on the backs of a surprising career year from A.J. Pierzynski and great pitching performances by Chris Sale and Jake Peavy. Pierzynski’s in Texas now, and Tyler Flowers isn’t replicating those numbers. And will the rotation be able to improve upon it’s overall performance last year? I don’t think so, and without any big additions to the offense I think they’ll max out at 88-90 wins. Sorry, Southsiders. Kansas City, I applaud your efforts to make a push, but barring breakout years from just about everyone up and down your lineup you’re probably going to fall short. The Blue Jays are immediately one of the front-runners in the American League after their stunning offseason, so add them to the shortlist of candidates that already includes the Rangers, Angels, Athletics, Tigers, Yankees, and Rays. Not including the Red Sox, that’s seven candidates for five spots, all of whom are capable of winning 93-95 games or more. So like last year, we’ll once again set the threshold at 93 wins for an invitation to the postseason. How good are the 2013 Red Sox? Ah, now this is the fun part. I went through Boston’s roster and projected each player’s plate appearances/innings pitched for the 2013 season. Because there are plenty of players not currently on the roster that will play games, those players have been included “Other Bench Bats,” “Other Starting Pitchers,” and “Other Relievers.” Their plate appearance or innings pitched totals were calculated by finding the entire team’s projected totals and subtracting the amounts already allocated to players on the roster. The team’s projected totals were estimated using 2012′s season numbers. Along with each player’s playing time, I also projected their Wins Above Replacement (WAR). These numbers are my own personal, raw estimates. They were not arrived at without much research and reasoning, but obviously they are my subjective projections and therefore completely open to debate. What isn’t open to debate is each player’s average WAR for the last three seasons, prorated over the amount of plate appearances or innings I projected them for. That’s included as well. Note: WAR is highly dependent on usage for each player, so in my projections I have done my best to account for each batter’s projected lineup slot, each pitcher’s projected rotation spot or bullpen role, and adjusted for age and injury risk. The number in the “Last 3 Years” columns obviously do not account for these factors, but I included them to show my projections are not overly optimistic. They are, in fact, quite fair. First, I find it interesting that my projections for both batters and pitchers were lower than the three-year averages for each group. For batters I projected Jarrod Saltalamacchia to lose some playing time to David Ross, and my projections for both players was lower than their three-year averages. First base was left as “TBD” in lieu of the team’s issues signing Mike Napoli. With their insistence on adding a bat to play the position, I projected the position at two wins, which Fangraphs.com defines as a role player-slash-solid starter. I also projected Will Middlebrooks to regress from his ridiculous per-game pace last year by a full win, and Dustin Pedroia and Ellsbury were projected as 5+ win players. “Other Bench Bats” was projected for two wins over 876 plate appearances, and the “Last 3 Years” values are those for Daniel Nava. According to Fangraphs,com, a 4-5 win player is considered an All-Star, a 5-6 win player is considered a superstar, and a 6-7 win player is considered an MVP. Using these definitions, I projected the Red Sox’s offense to have two borderline All-Stars (Ortiz and Victorino) and two true All-Stars (Pedroia and Ellsbury), one of whom (Pedroia) is a superstar, but a notch below an MVP candidate. I think all of that is more than fair. In the rotation, I project small resurgences that coincide with the return of John Farrell, but neither player is projected for their respective “Last 3 Year” averages. Dempster is projected for 3.5 wins, half a win more than his “Last 3 Year” average, so if you want to dock me a half win there I suppose you have an argument. I like Dempster. John Lackey is projected at 1.5 wins, which means he falls into that “role player” designation, but even if he fails in his projected 160 innings it shouldn’t be hard to find someone who can at least approach 1.5 wins. Felix Doubront at 2.3 wins over 180 innings is just 0.2 more than he did last year in 161 innings. Personally, I love Boston’s bullpen. I think Joel Hanrahan was a great addition, and Andrew Bailey (if he can stay healthy), Koji Uehara (quietly dominant), Junichi Tazawa (underrated), and Craig Breslow (not bad) have the makings of a deep, impactful bullpen. Oh, and I projected “Other Starting Pitchers” and “Other Relief Pitchers” at replacement level, i.e. zero wins. Sum all of that up, and I project the Boston Red Sox as a team to total 52.3 WAR. If you like the “Last 3 Year” averages better, they’re projected for a 57.0 WAR, but let’s stick with my lower estimate. Now, what the heck does that mean? How WAR and Win% are related Projecting a team for a 52.3 WAR is abstract to say the least, so how many games does that mean they’ll win? For quick estimates, it’s said that a team with all replacement level players (cumulative team WAR of 0.0) would win about 40 games. Add Boston’s projected 52.3 WAR to that and you get a projected 92.3 wins. I don’t like just relying on quick estimates, though. To find out the correlation between WAR and team win percentage (Win%), I found the cumulative WAR and Win% for all 30 teams over the last five years. Then I plotted each team’s average WAR for each season (their cumulative WAR divided by five) versus their Win% to see if there was any correlation. As it turns out, there’s a very strong one. With an r-squared value of 0.896, there’s a very clear correlation between a team’s WAR and their win percentage. And thanks to Microsoft Excel, we have an equation to help quantify it (displayed on the chart). So let’s plug our replacement level team’s 0.0 WAR into the equation to test our “a replacement level team is worth 40 wins” statement from before… …computing… According to the equation above, a 0.0 WAR team would have a winning percentage of .287. That’s 46.5 wins, so we were pretty close. Now, what about the 2013 Boston Red Sox and their projected 52.3 team WAR? Well, if the chart above isn’t lying, they have a projected Win% of .585. That’s 94.7 wins! If we were to take the “Last 3 Year” WAR of 57.0, they’d have a projected Win% of .612. That’s 99.1 wins! And going with our more conservative 94.7-win estimate, that should be enough to make the playoffs given our previously established 93-win requirement. The take-home message I’m not sitting here saying that the Red Sox are going to win 95 games and that you’re all idiots if you ignore these numbers. Frankly, I’d be surprised if they won 95 games this season. With all the change, all the upheaval, and all the uncertainy, a 26-game improvement from last year would be rather monumental. So why did I go through all of this? Because sports fans and media personalities are wrong if they say this team has no chance in 2013. This year is not a lost year. The Red Sox are fielding a competitive team, and they did it with smart offseason additions, wise subtractions, and an overall goal to be more balanced after last year’s debacle. I do think the Red Sox will make the playoffs. Texas looks more vulnerable than they have in recent seasons, and the AL Central is probably sending just one team to the postseason, so can Boston beat out three of Toronto, New York, Tampa Bay, Los Angeles, and Oakland? Yeah, I think they can, and I think it will be the Angels, Tigers, Rays, Yankees, and Red Sox that will be battling this October. That might be an unpopular opinion given America’s love for the Blue Jays right now, but through all these numbers and all my forced objectivity, I’ll let my Boston homerism shine through a little. Just know that I have the numbers to back it up.

GET THE YARDBARKER APP:
Ios_download En_app_rgb_wo_45
MORE FROM YARDBARKER

Jim Brown: I ‘encourage and support’ Johnny Manziel

Vincent criticizes NFLPA over spending millions on lawsuits

MLB urges Supreme Court to deny San Jose's A's appeal

Jeanie Buss: Phil Jackson loves the Twitter criticism

Vikings RB McKinnon: If I had a fantasy team, I'd take myself

LIKE WHAT YOU SEE?
GET THE DAILY NEWSLETTER:

Report: Kings have had discussions with John Calipari

De’Andre Johnson charged with misdemeanor battery

Russell Wilson on salary: If it's $25M or $1.5M, I'll be ready to go

Luke Ridnour reportedly traded for fourth time in a week

Scottie Pippen: I was LeBron James before LeBron James

Report: Marc Gasol only visiting with Memphis Grizzlies

Diamondbacks are contenders, but team's direction is unclear

Selecting the 2015 American League All-Stars

Jim Harbaugh is recruiting a prospect he once babysat

Conan makes Marshawn's wildest dreams come true

Brett Favre dons Packers jersey, says, 'I think I could still play'

Bo Knows, Bo Goes: Wisconsin feels pride and pain

Popovich won't call free agents at midnight, he'll be in bed

Joe Buck explains why he quit Twitter

Should the White Sox and Indians become sellers?

Fan bases most deserving of a Super Bowl 50 win

2015 NBA Draft grades: Eastern Conference

Report: Redskins urged by major group to change team name

MLB News
Delivered to your inbox
You'll also receive Yardbarker's daily Top 10, featuring the best sports stories from around the web. Customize your newsletter to get articles on your favorite sports and teams. And the best part? It's free!

By clicking "Sign Me Up", you have read and agreed to the Fox Sports Digital Privacy Policy and Terms of Use. You can opt out at any time. For more information, please see our Privacy Policy.
the YARDBARKER app
Get it now!
Ios_download En_app_rgb_wo_45

Selecting the 2015 AL All-Stars

NBA Draft grades: Eastern Conference

Under the radar NBA free agents

Michael Sam, boyfriend broke up?

Mickelson linked to money laundering?

Reminiscing on 'Love & Basketball' 15 years later

Selecting the 2015 NL All-Stars

The Sixers' latest horde

Projected landing spots for NBA's top free agents

MLB changes format for Home Run Derby

Revis to work out with Patriots DBs

Peterson: I'm still NFL's best RB

Today's Best Stuff
For Bloggers

Join the Yardbarker Network for more promotion, traffic, and money.

Company Info
Help
What is Yardbarker?

Yardbarker is the largest network of sports blogs and pro athlete blogs on the web. This site is the hub of the Yardbarker Network, where our editors and algorithms curate the best sports content from our network and beyond.