Originally posted on Fox Sports Southwest  |  Last updated 4/1/13
IRVING, Texas -- To fully understand quarterback Tony Romo's new contract with the Dallas Cowboys, you must understand that it's actually four different contracts. On Friday afternoon, Romo's agent fed to the media the blockbuster number: Six years and 108 million. That was the first number released into the ether. So it is destined to stick. Minutes later, I spoke to Cowboys vice president Stephen Jones, the club's point man for the negotiations. It occurred to me that the initial reports seemed vague in regard to whether the "six years" represented the entire stem-to-stern term of the agreement. "It's one plus six," Jones told me. Meaning the one remaining year plus six additional years. Stem-to-stern: Seven years and 119 million. Mixed into this is the 55 million guaranteed, which includes a 25 million signing bonus. And then there is the fourth, most important, most "real" number: Four years and 65 million. So which is is? In a sense, depending on how you examine it, Tony Romo's contract is actually four different contracts. Contract 1: CAA wants the world to know it's six years and 108 million. Why? The "108" number is a headline-getter and those numbers, divided up, create the impression that CAA won its client a deal worth 18 million a year. Contract 2: Jones tells me the full deal is seven years and 119 million. What's the difference? Those numbers, divided up, reduces the annual worth to 17 million. Contract 3: What matters most to the client? Guaranteed money, of course. This is CAA's real win: The 55 million guaranteed is a notch behind Tom Brady's record 57 million guarantee, a notch ahead of Joe Flacco's 52 million guarantee and a perfect match with Drew Brees' 55 million guarantee. (Soon to join this crowd: Aaron Rodgers, Matt Ryan and probably Matthew Stafford, with their representatives interested in headline-grabbing "100-million" stuff but with 50-million-plus guarantees the true test of the negotiations.) Again, Romo's "win" in these negotiations is the guaranteed money. Contract 4: The team's win: This is, as a practical matter, really a four-year contract worth 65 million. Divide that up and it's 16 million a year. and suddenly, the Romo price tag doesn't seem quite so exorbitant at all. How can this be only a four-year deal? The structure of the contract allows for that flexibility. There is money that can be moved around starting in 2014. (That includes ways to create cap room for the club.) There is the usual manner of escaping a contract gone bad, which includes renegotiating down as Romo gets older and theoretically less effective. There is 40 million worth of "base salary" listed in the deal (for the 2018 and 2019 seasons) that Romo may never see: he'll turn 38 after the 2017 season; there is no expectation from either side that Tony Romo will be the Dallas Cowboys' starting quarterback at age 38. The pressure is on Romo because the unwashed masses are going to stick with the 108 million number it's the most noted and it's the most bloated. But the smart money says Romo will never see that money. And due to the nature of his job as the centerpiece of a Dallas Cowboys franchise that habitually talks "Super Bowl," the four-years and 65 million the most important of Tony Romo's "four contracts" -- represents pressure enough.
Ios_download En_app_rgb_wo_45

Top 10 takeaways from Super Bowl 50

Was firing Jeff Hornacek the wrong move for the Suns?

Panthers picked wrong day to play worst game of the season

Was Peyton Manning paid for Budweiser mentions?

Cam Newton walks out of postgame press conference

Eli did not look thrilled after Peyton locked up Super Bowl


Rick Reilly sends awkward tweet during Super Bowl 50

Peyton Manning gives Papa John a kiss after game

Panthers' Josh Norman crying after losing Super Bowl

Peyton Manning ‘going to drink a lot of Budweiser’ after win

Where Peyton Manning ranks among Super Bowl era QBs

Peyton Manning declines to comment on possible retirement

Von Miller trolls Cam Newton, Panthers

Cam Newton proves again he is a great winner and terrible loser

Steph Curry trolls himself with Jordan face meme

Winners and losers from Super Bowl 50

The best and worst commercials from Super Bowl 50

Aqib Talib wipes out on NFL Network

Six best plays from Super Bowl 50

Five biggest boneheaded plays of Super Bowl 50

WATCH: Cam Newton gives questionable effort to recover fumble

Lions say Calvin Johnson's future still not determined

How Louisville basketball bungled their self-imposed ban

Ted Ginn Jr. whiffs on football twice on one play, results in Panthers turnover

Kony Ealy makes one-handed interception of Peyton Manning

NFL News
Delivered to your inbox
You'll also receive Yardbarker's daily Top 10, featuring the best sports stories from around the web. Customize your newsletter to get articles on your favorite sports and teams. And the best part? It's free!

By clicking "Sign Me Up", you have read and agreed to the Fox Sports Digital Privacy Policy and Terms of Use. You can opt out at any time. For more information, please see our Privacy Policy.
Get it now!
Ios_download En_app_rgb_wo_45

The best and worst commercials from Super Bowl 50

Best and worst from Super Bowl 50

Six best plays from Super Bowl 50

Eli doesn't look thrilled as Peyton wins Super Bowl

Did Beyonce almost fall down during Super Bowl halftime show?

Curry to serve as drummer for Panthers

Report: Marshawn Lynch plans to retire

The 14 biggest plays in Super Bowl history

Five outrageous predictions for Super Bowl 50

QUIZ: Name the winning starting quarterback from every Super Bowl

Today's Best Stuff
For Publishers
Company Info
Follow Yardbarker