Originally written on Puck Drunk Love  |  Last updated 11/13/14

OTTAWA, ON - JANUARY 19: Duncan Keith #2 of the Chicago Blackhawks, handles the puck against the Ottawa Senators in a game at Scotiabank Place on January 19, 2010 in Ottawa, Canada. The Ottawa Senators defeated the Chicago Blackhawks 4-1.(Photo by Phillip MacCallum/Getty Images)
As the resident woman around Puck Drunk Love, whenever some odd scandalous comment pops up that could be perceived as "anti-woman" or "misogynist" pops up, I take a look at it. Normally I mock it, like While the Men Watch or a Guide to Hockey for women. In Duncan Keith's case, I find myself, as a Blues fan, in the unfortunate position of defending a member of the Chicago Blackhawks. Ok, defending isn't the right word. He was still rude. But the following exchange isn't quite as "he man woman hater" as some folks might believe. Keith: “What did you see?”   Reporter Karen Thomson: “Well, there it looked like there was a penalty that went undetected. You seemed a bit frustrated.”   Keith: “Oh, no. I don’t think there was. I think he scored a nice goal, and that’s what the ref saw. Maybe we should get you as a ref maybe, hey?"   Thomson: “Yeah, maybe. Can’t skate though.”   Keith: “First female referee. Can’t probably play either, right? But you’re thinking the game, like you know it? Seeya.”   First mistake: stating to a hockey player that you can't skate. Second mistake: taking Duncan Keith, noted orator, seriously. He didn't say anything completely misogynistic; he wasn't saying that she doesn't know hockey because she's a woman. He pointed out the fact that she'd be the first female ref with some derision, but he never said "you don't know what you're talking about because you're a woman." His point was more along the lines of "you don't know what you're talking about because you can't skate and have never played the game." That argument is just as stupid, because people are allowed to analyze things that they have never participated in. If they weren't, I would never be allowed to read this book that I'm reading now about the Stanford Prison Experiment. Oh no! I wasn't there! I didn't develop it! I'm not allowed to have an opinion! Please.  This was a defensive move by Keith because he knew she had a point -- he got away with a penalty. Was it a case of gender bias? Maybe a little bit, but I don't think her gender had anything to do with this exchange, which is closer to Andy Sutton's classic "expert" interview than anything else. Keith just as well probably would have told a guy reporter that he didn't know what he was talking about. [follow]
MORE FROM YARDBARKER

Jameis Winston cleared in code of conduct case

Sherman: Patrick Peterson would be benched on Seahawks

Fans struck by lightning after Buccaneers-Packers game

Report: Philip Rivers playing through painful back injury

Report: Bears could have interest in Jim Harbaugh

Report: Shanahan interested in coaching next season

LIKE WHAT YOU SEE?
GET THE DAILY NEWSLETTER:

Report: Michigan has its eye on several NFL coaches

Report: Titans, Jay Cutler have mutual interest in trade

Phillies GM told Ryan Howard team is better off without him

Report: Browns interested in drafting Marcus Mariota

Chargers keep playoff hopes alive with comeback win

Robin Lopez responds to Khloe Kardashian dating rumors

WATCH: Three players ejected after Giants-Rams fight

WATCH: Dominic Raiola stomps on Bears player's ankle

WATCH: Arian Foster throws TD pass, drops scoreboard taunt

WATCH: Johnny Manziel leaves with injury after taking big hit

NHL has warned 22 players about diving

Nick Mangold wears NYDP hat to honor fallen officers

Five things we learned from the first day of bowl games

WATCH: South Alabama coach bloodied after kick to the face

Dan Mullen wears funny 'Christmas Vacation' sweater

WATCH: Redskins FB gets in Eagles fan's face after TD

WATCH: Utah runs trick play on first offensive play of game

Mick Cronin misses game with unruptured aneurysm

NHL News
Delivered to your inbox
You'll also receive Yardbarker's daily Top 10, featuring the best sports stories from around the web. Customize your newsletter to get articles on your favorite sports and teams. And the best part? It's free!

By clicking "Sign Me Up", you have read and agreed to the Fox Sports Digital Privacy Policy and Terms of Use. You can opt out at any time. For more information, please see our Privacy Policy.

Raiola stomps on Bears player's ankle

Bears interested in Jim Harbaugh?

Shanahan to return to 2015?

Browns interested in drafting Mariota?

Mullen wears funny Christmas sweater

RG3 returning to Redskins?

Tom Izzo hot after bad loss

Kings, Nets talking Deron Williams trade

WATCH: DeSean mocks Eagles

Vick: Winston is the future of the NFL

No NFL team in LA next season?

UNC rocking Jordan-era throwbacks

Today's Best Stuff
For Bloggers

Join the Yardbarker Network for more promotion, traffic, and money.

Company Info
Help
What is Yardbarker?

Yardbarker is the largest network of sports blogs and pro athlete blogs on the web. This site is the hub of the Yardbarker Network, where our editors and algorithms curate the best sports content from our network and beyond.