How Edmonton’s top players have stepped up, and where the rest of the team must improve

Without their top-two forward scorers on ice, every team has produced a goal differential above 47 percent and an expected goal differential above 49 percent — except the Oilers.

Some may point out that this method of analysis is unfair to Edmonton, as most teams’ top-two scorers will play on the same line, whereas McDavid and Draisaitl have centered their own separate lines for six of Edmonton’s seven playoff games. This is a fair point. So, here is a look at each playoff team’s results without their current top-two centers:

Using this method, Carolina sees a significant drop-off, while Vancouver interestingly sees an increase in goal differential but a decrease in expected goal differential. Nonetheless, this stat tells the exact same story for the Oilers.

A mere two goals in seven playoff games and a 29 percent goal differential without McDavid and Draisaitl is simply not satisfactory. Edmonton’s depth does not need to be world-beating, but a net-even goal differential should be the minimum expectation, and this is a standard they have not yet met.

How can Edmonton’s depth improve moving forward?

Edmonton has two primary options with their lineup – split up McDavid and Draisaitl, or load them up on the top line. For now, my guess is that Kris Knoblauch will stick with the latter, as it certainly worked in Game 2.

The simple, straightforward answer to this question is that Edmonton’s depth forwards must be better, particularly offensively. Ryan McLeod and Corey Perry have yet to record a single point in these playoffs, and Warren Foegele has just one 5-on-5 point, a secondary assist in Game 2 against Los Angeles. Dylan Holloway scored twice in Game 2 against LA, with Mattias Janmark earning assists on both goals, but neither have produced points in any other game. Adam Henrique scored in the first game of the playoffs, but has been unimpactful otherwise, and sustained an ankle injury in Game 5 against LA causing him to miss Game 1 against Vancouver.

Now, it’s not all about scoring, and strong defensive play should also be a priority for Edmonton’s depth forwards, which is why I am not as harsh on Ryan McLeod. McLeod has only been on-ice for 2 goals against at 5v5 (with one of them being an own-goal, bouncing off Nurse’s skate and into Edmonton’s net) in 7 games, as he holds a 55 percent expected goal differential. Of course, that should not be an excuse for 0 points in 7 games – you would need to play Patrice Bergeron-level defence to compensate for such a lack of offence – but at the very least, his defensive play has been quite good, and useful.

For Edmonton to have success with McDavid and Draisaitl on the same line, the Oilers will require much more from Ryan Nugent-Hopkins. At 5-on-5, RNH has 0 goals and just 1 primary assist, and he ranks last on the team with a brutal 32 percent expected goal differential. That must change moving forward.

My major qualm with loading up the top line is that RNH’s results on the wing have been far superior to his play at 2C; but, he could still be effective at center with the right wingers. In the regular-season, RNH ranked last on the team in 5-on-5 zone entries per hour; this is not necessarily a bad thing, but the point is that RNH would work best with linemates that can transport the puck.

Foegele ranked 3rd on the team in controlled entries per hour in the regular season, while speed/puck-carrying is Holloway’s most valuable attribute. A skilled, speedy line of Holloway/RNH/Foegele is intriguing, and could be worth a shot. It is also a great opportunity for Holloway to display what he can do in an increased role.

As for the third line, I have suggested this in the past numerous times, but I am fond of the McLeod/Kane duo. With Kane’s scoring touch, and McLeod’s defensive capabilities, they fit well stylistically, and complement each other’s major flaws. In the past three seasons, the two have played nearly 300 minutes together at 5v5, and Edmonton holds a strong 55 percent scoring chance differential in those minutes. For the other player on that line, the Oilers could play Adam Henrique in that spot, or, considering that Henrique is likely not at 100%, the Oilers could play him at 4C for the time being, which could make this lineup much deeper.

After going scoreless from October through February, I thought Connor Brown played reasonably well in March and April. Despite his overall struggles, Brown interestingly ranked third on the team in zone entries per hour, and fourth in zone exits per hour on the season. Brown has played just one game in the playoffs, but I would consider playing him in the lineup to inject more speed and transition into the bottom-six. Considering Perry’s offensive struggles, the Oilers could give Brown a shot at 3RW with Kane and McLeod.

So, if the Oilers wish to load up the top line, perhaps the most optimal lineup looks similar to this:

Draisaitl – McDavid – Hyman

Holloway – RNH – Foegele

Kane – McLeod – Brown/Perry

Janmark – Henrique – Brown/Perry

Don’t expect Edmonton to run these suggested lines in Game 3, as they will continue with the same lineup that won them Game 2. But, I would be interested to see these line combinations in action.

Line-matching and the Nurse-Ceci pairing

Right now, perhaps the biggest concern for the Oilers is the Darnell Nurse and Cody Ceci pairing. With Nurse and Ceci on-ice, the Oilers have been out-scored 3 to 8 at 5-on-5, out-shot 45 to 69, and out-chanced 38 to 60. In the playoffs, where the margins for error are razor-thin, a pair playing this poorly can cost you, and it certainly did in Game 1.

Playing Troy Stecher, or even Philip Broberg, should be an option, but it’s not something I would expect Knoblauch to do unless the Oilers sustain injuries or are on the brink of elimination with no other option.

To increase Edmonton’s chances of success with the current defensive pairings, the deployment should be adjusted. These are small samples, but here is a look at how Nurse and Ceci have performed with Edmonton’s top-three centers (note: RNH is not included here, as his TOI at 2C with the Nurse-Ceci pairing in these playoffs is even smaller):

Nurse and Ceci have been out-scored with every center they have played with, and have especially been brutal next to Draisaitl, but interestingly, they have controlled possession and scoring chances with Ryan McLeod’s line.

In Game 2, Knoblauch and Coffey limited Nurse and Ceci’s minutes, as they ranked 5th and 6th respectively in 5v5 TOI among Edmonton’s defencemen, and played less than 18 and a half minutes overall. Moving forward, this should continue, and I believe the coaching staff should attempt to have Nurse/Ceci on-ice with McLeod as much as possible.

Darnell Nurse has spent 44 percent of his TOI in the defensive zone (league average is 41 percent), and 37 percent in the offensive zone (league average is 37 percent). The major issue with the Nurse and Ceci duo right now is that they are spending far too much time in their own zone. They would heavily benefit from playing with forwards that excel at zone exits and can defend the neutral zone, which is another reason for playing him with McLeod, and why Brown could be a good option for the RW on the third line. McLeod/Brown could be heavily beneficial to to Nurse-Ceci in regards to getting the puck out of their own end.

So, what are the ideal line matchups?

In Games 1 and 2, McDavid’s line primarily matched up against Vancouver’s top line of J.T. Miller, Pius Suter, and Brock Boeser, and it worked. Miller’s line generated just one shot and 0.23 expected goals in 14 minutes against the Draisaitl – McDavid – Hyman line in Game 2. Knoblauch should continue to ensure Edmonton can get this matchup, as the Oilers spent all their time in the offensive zone with their top line on-ice, thus shutting down any opportunity for the Vancouver’s line to generate any offence (the best defence is good puck possession).

As for the other matchups, Elias Pettersson is technically Vancouver’s second line center, but Elias Lindholm’s line has been more dangerous in these playoffs. Lindholm has been on-ice for 3.45 goals per hour at 5v5, third on the Canucks behind his two linemates in Dakota Joshua and Conor Garland, while Pettersson has been on-ice for a mere 0.57 goals per hour (it is suspected he is not at 100%).

Considering that Lindholm scored 3 goals in just 6 minutes against the Nurse/Ceci pair in Game 1, Edmonton’s ideal matchups might be to play McLeod, Nurse, and Ceci against Pettersson, while RNH’s line and the Kulak/Desharnais pair play against Lindholm. Again, Edmonton’s potential success with their top line loaded up could largely depend on RNH’s 5v5 game, and he must be able to handle this role.

In the 2023 playoffs, line matching was a major downfall for Jay Woodcroft, who failed to properly match against Jack Eichel’s line. For me, these playoffs will be a massive test for Kris Knoblauch to see if he can a significant improvement on the coaching staff before him. With the Oilers heading back home, Kris Knoblauch will have last change, and he must use it effectively.

Tonight, the Oilers and Canucks will play Game 3 in Edmonton, with the series tied. So far, Edmonton’s top players have largely been the driving force behind their victories, and now, it is time for Edmonton’s depth players to step up.

Let’s hope they do.

*All stats used in the article are via Natural Stat Trick and NHL EDGE unless stated otherwise