Originally written on Days of Y'Orr  |  Last updated 11/17/14
The "Delay of Game" penalty has plauged the NHL since it's inception. It bit the Bruins in the ass Saturday night when Patrice Bergeron inadvertantly put the puck over the glass and put Boston 6-on-3 against New Jersey. Here's the video, curteosy of Dafoomie. If you haven't ever been to Dafoomie's channel, that's ashame. He continually posts Bruins highlights the night of a finished game. Subscribe to his channel, you won't be disappointed.  The Devils eventually scored the game winning goal with about 45 seconds left on the clock. The rule itself is pretty cut and dry, from NHL.com:  "When any player, while in his defending zone, shoots or bats (using his hand or his stick) the puck directly (non-deflected) out of the playing surface, except where there is no glass, a penalty shall be assessed for delaying the game. When the puck is shot into the players’ bench, the penalty will not apply. When the puck is shot over the glass ‘behind’ the players’ bench, the penalty will be assessed." Pretty self explanatory right? Mistake or not, if you put the puck into the arena in the defending zone, it is a penalty. Now I question I pose here is why? Why does the NHL have this penalty so cut and dry when there's a lot of issues with it?  With the introduction of hybrid icing, the NHL has given their officials the use of disgression when making icing calls. For those unaware with hybrid icing:  "The hybrid-icing system allows the linesman to blow the play dead and call an automatic icing if he determines that the puck will cross the goal line and the defending player is not behind in the race to the end-zone faceoff dots in his defensive zone. The faceoff would go to the far end of the ice as it did with icings called in the previous system the NHL used."  So what hybrid icing allows an official to do is to use their judgement to make a call. THE CONTROVERSY! So why can't this logic be used to determine what is a deliberate attempt to put the puck into the crowd from the defensive zone and what is a mistake? To me, it was pretty obvious that Patrice Bergeron didn't intentionally put the puck in the crowd, especially when trying to kill a four minute double minor penalty. Many can make the case that players would start to do this so his team can get a line change, but that's also an easy solution:  If the referee was to make the call that the play was inadvertant, keep the faceoff in the defensive zone and don't allow line changes. Basically, turn the call into an icing situation. Once icing is called, the team that iced the puck is not able to make a line change so why can't this be the same outcome? There aren't many instances I can recall where a player will deliberatly put the puck into the arena.  That penalty just makes little sense and it seems to crucify mistakes and carelessness more than anything.  Maybe I'm writing this because it's a reaction to Saturday night's game, but really it's something I've believed for a long time. There's a better way to construct this penalty than using a "you're all ******" mentality. In an age where the NHL seems to be constantly tweaking rules (hyrbid icing, jerseys untucked, etc) one would think that this change could easily happen, but also be miniscule enough that it wouldn't affect the flow of a hockey game.  What do you think? Is this an over-reaction on my part due to the outcome of Saturday's game or do you think the NHL should take a serious look at how this rule in written? Leave some comments below. 

Belichick: Ryan is 'buttering me up' with Hall of Fame praise

Marshall: Bears need to gel and do some kumbaya

Ray McDonald investigated for possible sexual assault

Red Sox appear content with rotation despite lack of true ace

Iguodala gets technical for mocking Conley travel

Bo Pelini takes shot at Nebraska during introductory presser


Belichick: Patriots need to play better against the Jets

Rex Ryan doesn't want to get in trouble talking about Revis

Bears Conte willing to shorten lifespan for NFL career

Former NFLer Simeon Rice: I was sexually abused as a child

Jets owner favorites tweet about firing John Idzik

Mike Ditka turned Bears game off in first half

Ray Rice, Adrian Peterson lead in 2014 athlete Google searches

Molding the market: All eyes on Max Scherzer

Another "Fire John Idzik' plane flies at Jets practice

Four can't-miss match-ups in NFL's Week 16

Report: Some Browns shunned Manziel during pregame

Making an attempt to understand Celtics' priorities

Gronk makes awkward sausage joke on 'Top Chef'

Walmart ripped for confusing Anthony/Lin doll

RG3 taking sabbatical from social media for rest of season

David Robinson's son to walk-on at Duke next year

The Most Valuable Player of each NFL division

5 NFL players who must step up in Week 16

NHL News
Delivered to your inbox
You'll also receive Yardbarker's daily Top 10, featuring the best sports stories from around the web. Customize your newsletter to get articles on your favorite sports and teams. And the best part? It's free!

By clicking "Sign Me Up", you have read and agreed to the Fox Sports Digital Privacy Policy and Terms of Use. You can opt out at any time. For more information, please see our Privacy Policy.

Four can't-miss match-ups in NFL's Week 16

RG3 quits social media for season

Each NFL division’s MVP

5 NFLers who must step up in Week 16

Most impressive college hoops teams

Five reasons why FSU is going to win the CFB Playoff

Boxer admits to dive in Rourke bout

FCC heard about Brady's swearing?

Embracing the hate of the Eagles-Cowboys Rivalry

DeSean Jackson mocks Eagles

Andrew Hawkins defends shirt

NFC South rising; keep playoffs as-is

Today's Best Stuff
For Bloggers

Join the Yardbarker Network for more promotion, traffic, and money.

Company Info
What is Yardbarker?

Yardbarker is the largest network of sports blogs and pro athlete blogs on the web. This site is the hub of the Yardbarker Network, where our editors and algorithms curate the best sports content from our network and beyond.