Originally posted on Thrashing the Blues  |  Last updated 2/19/12

I fully understand the fact that Warren Peters was frustrated towards the end of Saturday night's Minnesota Wild/St. Louis Blues game. The Wild were getting walloped 4-0, they only managed thirteen shots on net, and they just weren't playing very good hockey. It happens. And yes, the Blues're a pretty hard hitting team, and sure, if you're on the ice buzzing around, it might not look like Jared Spurgeon blew a tire; it could have looked like Backes rode him into the boards.

But regardless of what you saw as a player on the ice, there's never any excuse for a stupid retaliatory penalty that could cost your team. There's also never an excuse for a retaliatory penalty that could hurt another player, you know, on purpose. That's pretty much what Peters does here by cross-checking Backes in the head. It's next to impossible to interpret this to be an accident:

[youtube]j2tJNQn8gPM[/youtube]

Sure, Peters probably wanted to get Backes' attention rather than popping him so hard the captain took a bit to get up from the ice, but regardless of if there's an intent to injure or not, there's still an intent to hit him upside the head. Peters got a five minute major for crosschecking as well as a game misconduct, which is basically a guarantee that the hit'll be looked at by Brendan Shanahan. Peters himself admitted that he didn't mean to go for the head, but he needed to be in more control of the stick.

So, what does Sheriff Shanny have to say?

Wait, what? Sure, no priors makes sense, I guess (though it's not like you can't do something stupid on your first shot). But taking a guy's word for the fact that it was an "accident?" Come on, Shanny. The guy admitted he needed to be in more control of his stick; you've penalized people for that before. Accidental plays, like Ian Cole's hit on Justin Abdelkader that got Cole suspended for three games (a good sentence, I still think), were not accepted as an excuse for other players. Why is it one now?

Consistency in punishment is extremely important, especially when it stems from an incident that isn't even a hockey play gone wrong -- at the very least, it's an intent to injure gone wrong, because Backes is pretty much fine afterwards. Hockey Wilderness has a pretty spot on take; it's refreshing to see fans of a team not fall all over themselves in sticking up for an inappropriate play -- of course, I'd expect no less from such a solid blog as theirs.

As they point out, the NHL always seems to punish to the injury, not the intent. Now Shanny's taking guys' words for it. Here's Shanahan's full explanation:

"While we accept Peters' explanation that he was trying to crosscheck Backes in the shoulder, the fact remains, in doing so, his stick rides up and he recklessly crosschecks Backes in the head and needs to be responsible for his stick."

Um, "his stick rides up?" He's not hitting a guy during a play. He's basically the third man into a scrum that was more or less just a shoving match. You can't hit players in the head during a play, so why can you hit them upside the head with your stick in post-play fisticuffs? 

I didn't expect more than one game for this, and that game was Sunday's tilt against the Bruins. Why didn't I expect more than a game for something as outrageous as this? Because this is the NHL, and like it or not -- Shanny or Campbell -- we still have to deal with the Wheel of Morality.

GET THE YARDBARKER APP:
Ios_download En_app_rgb_wo_45
MORE FROM YARDBARKER

Sanu: Halftime show played role in Super Bowl collapse

James Dolan is among potential group of investors of new arena for New York Islanders

Report: Rams, Clippers discussing NBA venue in Inglewood

Terrence Jones reportedly interested in joining Celtics

LeBron reverses course, says he ‘always felt good’ about Cavs

LIKE WHAT YOU SEE?
GET THE DAILY NEWSLETTER:

Report: Ole Miss tried to implicate Mississippi State in football scandal

Jamaal Charles could be on the roster bubble

Jimmy Butler on state of Bulls: ‘I just want to win at all costs’

Report: Giants will be ‘aggressive’ in trying to sign Jason Pierre-Paul

Report: Porzingis avoided ligament damage in ankle

Brooks Koepka meltdown includes whiff, stomping head off driver

Top 10 shortstops in baseball for 2017

The most dangerous NBA teams flying under the radar

Eat, Drink, Watch: Your award-worthy weekend planning guide

Grading the NBA trade deadline on the Vince Carter scale

Box Score 2/24: A night of NBA disrespect

As NHL trade deadline nears, seven teams who could be dealing

The 'Pete Rose instead of Kareem? Surely, you can't be serious' quiz

Streaming sports docuseries you don't want to miss

Teams that can prevent a Cavs-Warriors NBA Finals three-peat

The NFL off-season is a passer’s fancy

The Aesthetic: Pushing the boundaries of the three-pointer

NBA coaches who should be fired soon

NHL News
Delivered to your inbox
You'll also receive Yardbarker's daily Top 10, featuring the best sports stories from around the web. Customize your newsletter to get articles on your favorite sports and teams. And the best part? It's free!

By clicking "Sign Me Up", you have read and agreed to the Fox Sports Digital Privacy Policy and Terms of Use. You can opt out at any time. For more information, please see our Privacy Policy.
the YARDBARKER app
Get it now!
Ios_download En_app_rgb_wo_45

Top 10 shortstops in baseball for 2017

The most dangerous NBA teams flying under the radar

Eat, Drink, Watch: Your award-worthy weekend planning guide

Grading the NBA trade deadline on the Vince Carter scale

Streaming sports docuseries you don't want to miss

As NHL trade deadline nears, seven teams who could be dealing

The 'Pete Rose instead of Kareem? Surely, you can't be serious' quiz

Teams that can prevent a Cavs-Warriors NBA Finals three-peat

The NFL off-season is a passer’s fancy

QUIZ: Name every MLB pitcher who has recorded 10 or more shutouts in a single season

Today's Best Stuff
For Publishers
Company Info
Help
Follow Yardbarker