Yardbarker
Yardbarker
x
20 facts you might not know about 'Spider-Man 3'
Sony/Marvel/Columbia Pictures

20 facts you might not know about 'Spider-Man 3'

The movie trilogy is a hallowed concept. We can probably thank Star Wars for that. After the success of the first two Spider-Man movies directed by Sam Raimi, a third was inevitable. There are many who still consider Spider-Man 2 the best superhero movie ever made. Spider-Man 3, on the other hand, has become one of the most polarizing. What happened? These 20 facts can help shed some light on Spider-Man 3.

 
1 of 20

The team was locked in early

The team was locked in early
Sony Pictures, Columbia Pictures, Marvel Entertainment

Before Spider-Man 2 had even come out, Spider-Man 3 was announced. Before production began, a release date for the third film was announced as well. Alvin Sargent, an Oscar-winning screenwriter, signed a seven-picture deal with Sony. Yes, seven. Sargent had also written Spider-Man 2, and Sony wanted to lock him up.

 
2 of 20

Sandman was Raimi’s idea

Sandman was Raimi’s idea
Sony

When thinking about his villains for Spider-Man 3, Raimi knew he wanted to bring back Harry Osborn, son of Green Goblin Norman Osborn, to finish off this story. Additionally, he wanted to include Sandman as a villain for Spider-Man to deal with, as Raimi though he was visually interesting.

 
3 of 20

Raimi changed the Sandman character from the comics

Raimi changed the Sandman character from the comics
Sony

You know how in the Batman comics, a random criminal named Joe Chill kills Bruce Wayne’s parents? But in Tim Burton’s Batman, they made it a pre-Joker Jack Napier? Spider-Man 3 did something similar to Sandman. In the comics, he’s a simple petty criminal who becomes, well, a man of sand. For Spider-Man 3, though, Raimi decided he wanted Flint Marko, a.k.a. Sandman, to be the one who killed Uncle Ben.

 
4 of 20

Raimi had another baddie in mind as well

Raimi had another baddie in mind as well
Sony Pictures, Columbia Pictures, Marvel Entertainment

In addition to Harry Osborn and Sandman, Raimi wanted another villain in the mix. Namely, Vulture. The director went as far as to talk to Ben Kingsley about playing the Vulture, but then the character was nixed.

 
5 of 20

Another villain was added at the studio’s request

Another villain was added at the studio’s request
Sony

Avi Arad, a producer on the Spider-Man films, really wanted Venom in the movie. Venom was a popular modern Spider-Man antagonist. Arad felt like Raimi was too devoted to the villains he liked, and the producer wanted a more populist choice. Begrudgingly, the director included Venom to appease Arad.

 
6 of 20

The producers added another character to the mix as well

The producers added another character to the mix as well
Sony

Mary Jane had been around and played by Kirsten Dunst for the entirety of the film series. However, the producers wanted another Peter Parker love interest, Gwen Stacy, added to the movie. Once again, Raimi listened to his producers, and Stacy was included in the film as another potential love interest.

 
7 of 20

Thomas Haden Church was having a moment

Thomas Haden Church was having a moment
Sony

Church had spent years as a character actor, probably best known for a role in the sitcom Wings. Then, suddenly, he was an Oscar nominee for Sideways. In the wake of Sideways, Church was offered the role of Sandman. Even though the script wasn’t finished at the time, Church agreed to sign on.

 
8 of 20

The movie was a little rough on Topher Grace

The movie was a little rough on Topher Grace
Sony Pictures, Columbia Pictures, Marvel Entertainment

Grace, a fan of Venom from reading comics as a kid, was happy to be offered the role of Eddie Brock, a.k.a. Venom. Unfortunately, the film was a tough shoot for Grace. He found the Venom suit unpleasant to wear, and it took an hour for him to get in the costume, and then four hours to get in prosthetics to play Venom. Plus, the fake fangs he wore ended up bruising his gums.

 
9 of 20

Bryce Dallas Howard was acting for two

Bryce Dallas Howard was acting for two
Sony

Howard was cast to play Gwen Stacy. It was an interesting choice because they stayed true to Stacy’s blonde locks in the comics, and Howard is famously — like her father, Ron — a redhead. The actress performed several stunts herself, but in retrospect, she probably wouldn’t have. Unknown to Howard at the time, she was pregnant while filming Spider-Man 3.

 
10 of 20

It was the last role for one actor

It was the last role for one actor
Sony

Cliff Robertson, an Oscar winner, played Uncle Ben in Spider-Man. He reprised the role in Spider-Man 3 — in a flashback, of course. This would be Robertson’s last role. He would retire afterward and not act again before his death in 2011.

 
11 of 20

Two classic cameo guys have cameos, naturally

Two classic cameo guys have cameos, naturally
Sony

Stan Lee is known for cameoing in Marvel movies, popping up dozens of times before his passing. In addition to Lee showing up, Bruce Campbell has a role as a French maitre’d. Raimi and Campbell are childhood friends who broke through together with The Evil Dead. Raimi loves to give his buddy Bruce cameos, and across his Spider-Man trilogy, he appeared as three different characters.

 
12 of 20

The production loss a couple of people from the previous film

The production loss a couple of people from the previous film
Sony

John Dykstra won an Oscar for Best Visual Effects for Spider-Man 2, but he decided not to return for Spider-Man 3. On top of that, Danny Elfman did not return to compose the score for this movie. He called working with Raimi on the second film a “miserable experience.” Raimi and Elfman would apparently bury the hatchet, though, as they worked together on Oz the Great and Powerful.

 
13 of 20

Church injured himself while filming

Church injured himself while filming
Sony

In the subway fight scene between Sandman and Spider-Man, Church was supposed to miss with a punch and cause a piece of the wall to break off. There was also supposed to be a foam brick for Church to punch. Unfortunately for him, the foam brick wasn’t in place, and so the actor punched a real brick. He broke three fingers in the process.

 
14 of 20

A key character from the first film has a cameo

A key character from the first film has a cameo
Sony

Remember Flash Thompson? The bully that Peter Parker fights in the first film, played by future notable actor Joe Manganiello? Well, Manganiello returns for Spider-Man 3, but you may need to look for him. The actor showed up for a cameo in the background during Harry Osborne’s funeral.

 
15 of 20

The comic book names of the villains are barely used

The comic book names of the villains are barely used
Sony

We may think of the villains by their names from the comics. There’s a shorthand there. However, Venom is never actually called Venom in the comics. Flint Marko is only referred to as “Sandman” once. Also, in the comics Harry becomes known as New Goblin, but in this film, he is never called that. Peter calls him “Goblin Junior” once, but that’s it.

 
16 of 20

It set box-office records

It set box-office records
Sony

On May 4, 2007, Spider-Man 3 was released in 4,253 theaters across North America. This was a new record. That helped the movie make $104 million worldwide on the Friday it opened, a new record. Then, on Saturday, the film broke its own record by raking in $117.6 million.

 
17 of 20

All in all, it was a huge hit

All in all, it was a huge hit
Sony

Bringing in $336.5 million domestically, Spider-Man 3 was the highest-grossing film in North America in 2007. Worldwide, it made $894.9 million, which was good enough to finish third overall in the box office. Spider-Man 3 was the highest-grossing film in Raimi’s trilogy.

 
18 of 20

That doesn’t mean Raimi likes it, though

That doesn’t mean Raimi likes it, though
Sony

Spider-Man 3 brought in a ton of cash, but critics and moviegoers were mixed on it. The response to the film was lukewarm at best. Raimi did not feel lukewarm about it, though. In 2014, the director called his own movie “awful.” Arad, for his part, would take blame for the movie’s failing, admitting he pushed Venom on Raimi, and ultimately, it didn’t work for the film.

 
19 of 20

A fourth movie was almost made

A fourth movie was almost made
Sony

Raimi’s Spider-Man trilogy was not intended to be a trilogy. There was actually talk of doing up to six films. In fact, a fourth film was in production. A script was written, and John Malkovich was in talks to play Vulture, while Anne Hathaway was going to play Black Cat. Then, Raimi pulled out of the project. He despised every iteration of the script. With a 2011 release date already on the books, Raimi didn’t think he could make a good movie on the timeline asked of him. Nobody stepped into his shoes, and the movie didn’t happen.

 
20 of 20

Before the crossover, there was almost another crossover

Before the crossover, there was almost another crossover
Sony

At this point, we assume you are familiar with Spider-Man: No Way Home and the fact that Tobey Maguire and Andrew Garfield both appeared in the film as Peter Parkers/Spider-Men from the multiverse. Before that happened, though, there was talks of a “Spider-Man vs. The Amazing Spider-Man” movie that would have been a crossover featuring just Maguire and Garfield. Sony had wanted Raimi to direct it. That movie, alas, did not happen.

Chris Morgan

Chris Morgan is a Detroit-based culture writer who has somehow managed to justify getting his BA in Film Studies. He has written about sports and entertainment across various internet platforms for years and is also the author of three books about '90s television.

More must-reads:

Customize Your Newsletter

Yardbarker +

Get the latest news and rumors, customized to your favorite sports and teams. Emailed daily. Always free!

TODAY'S BEST

Bears have major concern heading into Steelers Week 12 showdown
NFL

Bears have major concern heading into Steelers Week 12 showdown

The NFC North-leading Chicago Bears have a potential problem heading into Week 12 against the Pittsburgh Steelers (6-4). At Wednesday's practice, the Bears (7-3) were without their top three linebackers, Tremaine Edmunds (groin), T.J. Edwards (hand/hamstring) and Noah Sewell (elbow), making their health something to monitor before Sunday's game between division leaders. Linebacker injuries an area of concern for Chicago Bears in Week 12 versus Pittsburgh Steelers Chicago's depth at linebacker will be tested if the trio can't play. D'Marco Jackson, Amen Ogbongbemiga and rookie fourth-rounder Ruben Hyppolite II are the only healthy linebackers on the active roster. They've combined to play 50 defensive snaps this season. Nine-year veteran Jalen Reeves-Maybin and Carl Jones Jr., a 2024 undrafted free agent, could be in line to move up from the practice squad. Edwards has missed Chicago's past two games after undergoing hand surgery, but the team declined to put him on injured reserve, avoiding a mandatory four-game absence. Sewell, who previously missed Week 7 with a concussion, has started in Edwards' place and led the team in tackles against the Minnesota Vikings (4-6) in Week 11. Edmunds has made 34 consecutive starts dating back to Nov. 19, 2023 and is having an All-Pro-caliber season, leading the team with 89 tackles while adding four interceptions, a sack and nine passes defended. The Steelers have their own injury concerns with quarterback Aaron Rodgers (wrist) uncertain to play on Sunday, though it remains a possibility after he was determined not to need surgery. "This might go right up until Friday or Saturday," ESPN NFL insider Dan Graziano wrote about a potential timeline for a decision on Rodgers' availability. The Bears have been tormented by Rodgers throughout his 18-year career. The longtime Packers quarterback (2005-22) is 11-3 all-time at Soldier Field, including 10-1 in his last 11 starts. He's won four in a row dating back to 2019. If Rodgers plays, Chicago could have a much more difficult time stopping the Steelers offense considering the state of its linebackers. The Bears may need a magical elixir to get back to full health in time for the pivotal showdown. With only a one-game lead in the NFC North, every game counts for Chicago. But it could be severely undermanned if its top three linebackers are forced to watch from the sideline.

Aaron Rodgers explains his criteria for playing Sunday vs. Bears
NFL

Aaron Rodgers explains his criteria for playing Sunday vs. Bears

Aaron Rodgers has always been a tough quarterback. He has dealt with several injuries throughout the course of his career, but he's always done everything he could to see the field. That's no different now that he's with the Pittsburgh Steelers and dealing with a fracture in his left (non-throwing) wrist. Rodgers injured himself against the Cincinnati Bengals on Sunday, but he's already talking about trying to get back for Pittsburgh's Week 12 contest against the Chicago Bears. In fact, he revealed on Wednesday that he will try things out at practice before this week is over. "It feels better than it did Sunday, that's for sure," Rodgers said Wednesday afternoon, according to Brooke Pryor of ESPN. "... Was thankful to get today to work with [head athletic trainer Gabe Amponsah] and just focus on rehab for today. Trying to get back on the field tomorrow and see what I can do." Aaron Rodgers going to test out his wrist injury on Thursday Rodgers wants to be able to play against the Bears, a team he has owned throughout the years, but he's also saying that he'll be cautious. Remember, he is just weeks away from turning 42. A fractured wrist would be tough to play with at 24. As anyone who has ever gotten older would attest, things tend to hurt even more as you age. Throw in the fact that Rodgers is playing perhaps the most physical sport on Earth, and it makes sense that he does have a very specific standard that he must meet before he decides if he can play — and it has nothing to do with pain. "It's a safety thing," Rodgers said. Rodgers has played in 29 regular-season games against the Bears in his NFL career. Including two playoff wins, he boasts a 26-5 record against them. Since he last squared off with Chicago as the quarterback of the Green Bay Packers in 2022, he had won nine games in a row against the Bears. If he feels he can keep himself safe on Sunday, you can bet he's going to try to play.

There's 'already chatter' Vikings could make Mac Jones call amid J.J. McCarthy's struggles
NFL

There's 'already chatter' Vikings could make Mac Jones call amid J.J. McCarthy's struggles

The ongoing struggles of second-year pro J.J. McCarthy have already sparked conversations among the NFL community about how the Minnesota Vikings might manage their quarterback situation next year. On Wednesday, NFL insider Mike Florio of Pro Football Talk shared an interesting update regarding the Vikings' plans beyond January. Why Mac Jones could be an option for the Vikings According to Florio, "there’s already chatter in some circles that" the Vikings will explore trading for San Francisco 49ers backup Mac Jones during the offseason. Jones signed a two-year deal with the 49ers in March and, per Sports Illustrated's Albert Breer, is under contract for $4.66M for the 2026 season. Breer also linked Jones with the Vikings. Jones went 5-3 across eight starts with the 49ers this season in place of QB1 Brock Purdy, who was dealing with a toe injury. Purdy inked a massive extension with the 49ers last offseason, and there's no indication he's in any danger of losing the starting job to Jones. Meanwhile, McCarthy has made just five career regular-season starts after he missed time this fall due to an ankle injury. The 2024 first-round draft pick spent his entire rookie campaign recovering from a full meniscus repair. According to Pro Football Reference, McCarthy heads into Week 12 ranked last in the NFL among qualified players with a 26.6 adjusted QBR, a 61.7 passer rating and a 52.9 percent completion percentage. He's 2-3 as a starter, while Minnesota is 4-6. Could history repeat itself for Vikings? Last year, Vikings head coach Kevin O’Connell repeatedly said that spending the 2023 season working with 49ers head coach and offensive guru Kyle Shanahan helped current Seattle Seahawks starting quarterback Sam Darnold experience a necessary career reset. With Darnold in the lineup, the 2024 Vikings finished 14-3 before losing in the wild-card round of the playoffs. Breer mentioned that the Vikings trading for Jones would "be a way to bring in competition for J.J. McCarthy and provide a layer of insurance at an affordable rate for a loaded roster, should McCarthy not ascend through the rest of this season." In short, it sounds like McCarthy will be playing for more than just wins from Sunday's game against the Green Bay Packers (6-3-1) through Week 18. As of Wednesday afternoon, ESPN BET had the Vikings as six-point underdogs against the Packers.

Commanders could make major decision on QB Jayden Daniels
NFL

Commanders could make major decision on QB Jayden Daniels

Ten months ago, the Washington Commanders were celebrating an upset win over the Lions in the divisional round of the playoffs and preparing to face the Eagles for a chance at a Super Bowl berth, all on the arms and legs of a rookie quarterback. Fast forward to Wednesday, and Washington’s season has gone anything but according to plan. As the second-year passer Jayden Daniels continues to work his way back from his third injury of the season, the surprising position they find themselves in could dictate the grounds for his return. A week ago, Jeremy Fowler of ESPN passed on rumors that the Commanders were preparing for a potential five- to six-week absence for Daniels, despite other reports estimating a mere three weeks of recovery. The potential for a longer-than-expected recovery, combined with a loss to the Dolphins in Madrid, had Fowler speculating about a situation in which Daniels doesn’t play again this year. A week later, that loss to Miami has actualized, and Washington, as a result, now faces a week of reflection and decision-making. Fellow ESPN reporter Dan Graziano notes that the Commanders will take this Week 12 bye week to “examine everything” and acknowledges that “external debates” have taken place concerning the reasonableness of Daniels not returning this year, but he asserts that he’s been told “the plan in Washington is still that Daniels will return to the starting lineup once doctors clear him from his elbow injury.” How should the Commanders handle this Jayden Daniels situation? While Fowler doesn’t dispel the notion of that being the Commanders’ plan, he maintains that his sources have Daniels as possibly being back for Week 13, though “the team has loosely braced for an absence of five to six weeks, just in case.” No teams have been mathematically eliminated from the playoffs yet, but if this turns into a six-week absence and the team’s six-game losing streak continues, Washington could find itself well out of playoff contention with three games left on the schedule against division rivals who could be playing for their playoff lives. If the Commanders are sitting at 3-11 with games against the Eagles, Cowboys, and Eagles, again, sending Daniels out with nothing on the line feels borderline irresponsible. Considering that Daniels has sustained three different injuries this year, testing his durability with nothing to play for could obviously do more harm than good. Graziano, though, points out that Daniels is likely advocating to get back on the field, and considering this latest injury was not related to his legs or his throwing arm, the team may not be as cautious with their approach to his return. They’ll have the rest of the week to consider all of this before they have to start game-planning for a Week 13 game against the Broncos. If Daniels is good to for the matchup with Denver, the chances of reinjury may be a bit higher against a defense that has a 15-sack lead on the second-best sack-getting team in the NFL.