Not every team has the luxury of having a “capital C closer” like Emmanuel Clase, Mason Miller or Ryan Helsey. When they’re dialled in on the mound, finishing games are automatic.
But then you look at guys like Kyle Finnegan, who saved 38 games for the Washington Nationals in 2024 and he was just non-tendered. Despite saving 30 games for the Yankees, Clay Holmes lost his closer role late in the season and is now a free agent.
There is no position on a roster that can be more volatile than closer, as evidenced once more by the Blue Jays non-tendering Jordan Romano a few weeks ago. Sure, teams can survive without a shutdown guy in save situations, but it makes those high-leverage spots way more comfortable.
Enter Chad Green, who was thrust into a closer role for the Blue Jays this past year by circumstance. With Romano down to injury and Yimi García on the injured list, the Blue Jays entrusted Green with save situations by the end of June.
Looking around Toronto’s bullpen, they had little choice but to instill the right-hander with those duties, and at first glance, his numbers seemed decent through 2024. His 3.21 ERA in 51 appearances looks above average, but peek under the hood and you’ll notice a lot of worrisome trends.
Top of the order?
No problem for Chad Green pic.twitter.com/bFB4tVSurc
— Toronto Blue Jays (@BlueJays) August 3, 2024
Strikeouts were down, walks were up, exit velocity was up, and despite boasting an ERA under 2.00 for most of the season, his expected ERA of 3.80 and 4.29 FIP indicated Green was due for a blowup. The month of September caught up with him as his ERA shot up from 1.62 to 3.21 in the span of nine games in September.
Green was fine in a pinch when the Blue Jays didn’t have any decent pitchers to close out games in 2024, but what about 2025 when this team should be competitive again? Can they roll with the former Yankee as the go-to closer in 2025?
First off, I think a little perspective is required. Some folks compare his 2024 numbers to his brief stint in 2023 down the stretch with the Blue Jays, which aren’t apples-to-apples. It’s best to weigh his previous full season in 2021 with his 2024 numbers and under that lens, things look a little less grim.
Season | IP | ERA | xERA | K% | BB% | K-BB% | FIP |
2021 | 83.2 | 3.12 | 3.22 | 31.4 | 5.4 | 26 | 3.59 |
2024 | 53.1 | 3.21 | 3.80 | 21.9 | 6.7 | 15.2 | 4.29 |
On the whole, a lot of Green’s numbers from 2024 were on track with his stats from his last full season with the Yankees in 2021. But the major red flag is the significant drop in strikeout rate from 31.4% in 2021 to 21.9% in 2024. High-pressure situations aren’t times when you can mess around, which is why most high-leverage pitchers have big strikeout numbers. Managers cannot afford to put the ball in play with the slimmest of margins, and a 21.9% strikeout rate is quite low for a high-leverage arm, let alone a closer.
It depends on where the Blue Jays want to go this offseason and where they deem they need to allocate the most resources. If they’re going for a big bat or a big arm to boost up the starting rotation, overhauling the bullpen will become less of a priority.
Sticking with Green as the closer in 2025 isn’t a detriment to the Blue Jays, but if he’s closing games out of Spring Training, then the Blue Jays prioritized other areas on the roster rather than the bullpen. Keep in mind, this is a team that’s projected to have the third-worst bullpen in MLB in 2025. It’s not an inditement on this front office if the team doesn’t roll into next season with a shiny new closer. Yes, the Blue Jays could be successful in 2025 with Chad Green as their nine-inning arm but his strengths are suited more to how he pitched for the team back in 2023; as the seventh or eighth-inning guy in more of a setup capacity.
Congratulations to Chad Green on being named a Finalist for AL Comeback Player!
17 Saves | 3.21 ERA #PlayersChoiceAwards pic.twitter.com/PxZwUjnbYn
— Toronto Blue Jays (@BlueJays) October 21, 2024
Until he can get his strikeout numbers back into the 25-30% range, his stuff doesn’t play the best within save situations. The best relievers in the league are rocking at least a 30% strikeout rate and their Stuff+ is 125 or higher. Green’s 120 Stuff+ ranked 39th of 169 qualified relievers this past season.
But on that same token, Toronto can augment their bullpen on the fly much easier than reshaping a starting rotation or fortifying a starting lineup. They don’t have to shop at the top of the market by signing Tanner Scott or Jeff Hoffman, but Paul Sewald and Clay Holmes would be a nice start. Pair them in late-game relief roles with potentially trading for St. Louis Cardinals’ closer Ryan Helsey and the Blue Jays suddenly have at least a league-average bullpen again. Hell, even betting on a bounce-back season from Pittsburgh Pirates closer David Bednar would be a vast improvement.
There are several ways the Blue Jays could take this thing in the offseason, but as much as Ross Atkins wants to downplay how little of a budget the team has for the bullpen, additions need to be made.
He said the team might need to get “creative” and they’ve already done the first part of that heavy lifting by releasing Genesis Cabrera and non-tendering Romano and Dillon Tate. Now comes the addition portion, whether that’s via free agency and/or trading to bulk up the bullpen.
Green is one of the few Blue Jays relievers from 2024 who will be back at Spring Training. But will he be the closer for the second consecutive season? If that’s the case, either the Blue Jays had an underwhelming offseason or they allocated their resources to the starting lineup and the rotation over the bullpen.
More must-reads:
Get the latest news and rumors, customized to your favorite sports and teams. Emailed daily. Always free!