Originally posted on The B1g Time  |  Last updated 11/18/12
(This is the 1st in a two part series looking into the fast moving Big Ten expansion 2.0 rumors) The Tagline here is "In Expansion We Trust," and we still hold steady to that in the face of what is becoming mounting evidence that Maryland and Rutgers are on their way to the Big Ten, but the question remains is this the right move with the right teams for one of the most historical conferences in all of college athletics? Well, this writer says yes. Barring a crazy vote of the University of Maryland Board of Regents at 9am Eastern tomorrow it's expected that this move will happen and while we here at Delany's Dozen have heard just about every crazy rumor and conference realignment scenario, this one actually holds water. As a result it's time to look into why the move to add the Terps and Scarlet Knights makes sense. First off, we need to put aside the competitive aspect of the move because that's not what this is about. Heck, that's not what any of college sports bazillions of rounds of conference realignment have been about. It's all been about the almighty television dollar, bottom line. Let's be 100% honest here, this move is all about money for the Big Ten. It sure as heck isn't about on the field, court, or ice competition. Unlike the addition of Nebraska, which is elite in about 90% of the sports they compete in, neither Rutgers or Maryland can lay claim to a long held tradition of greatness in anything athletically. Yes, Maryland basketball was at one time amazing, but those days have seemingly come and gone and they are in a rebuilding mode.  Now that we've got that out of the way, it's time to get down to the business of big time college athletics. A land where millions and millions of dollars are at stake in an ever increasing arms race for bigger, badder, and newer athletic facilities. That means conferences need to find ways to fork out more and more money to their member institutions and that's where TV contracts and media rights in general come in and that's where this move further east makes all the sense in the world.  Everyone seems to have their piece of the ESPN pie and the Big Ten has a well established cash cow in the Big Ten Network at their disposal. The nearest media rights contract doesn't come up for another 5 years for the conference, so how do you try and keep pace with the likes of the SEC, Big 12, and Pac-12 which have all added new ESPN mega deals to their portfolios?  Simple, add two schools that reach into the biggest possible media markets in the east... New York/New Jersey (No. 1) and Baltimore/DC (No. 8). Even by a conservative estimate there's about an extra 14 million people to put your product in front of and those are numbers a move to say Missouri or Louisville could never come close to matching, EVER. The only one that could do it is Notre Dame, but frankly that shipped has sailed in my eyes. With Delany planting his flag right in the back yards of those two programs it forces cable & satellite providers in the area to carry the Big Ten network as part of the main tier of their cable packages and that means multi-millions of dollars coming back to the Big Ten coffers on an annual basis, right here and now. Yes, it's true that both of these markets are more pro sports orientated in their fan bases, but that's not the point. The point is that adding the flagship schools of those two areas requires the attention and upgrade in placement on the cable and satellite packages.  We haven't even gotten into why the moves make sense $$ wise for both Maryland and Rutgers yet, but it's safe to say it's a big jump up in the money they will see from their current conferences. In fact it's enough in Maryland's case to almost completely knock out the athletic budget deficit they are currently running (estimated at $7 million this year).  Things aren't nearly as bad for Rutgers, but they are running in the red as well and this would put them in the black big time. As fans of your specific team and the Big Ten in general it may be sad to see the Big Ten making a reach for two schools that seemingly add nothing to the table on the competitive side of things in the short term, but the reality is these conference moves have nothing, I repeat NOTHING to do with the fans. If so the conference wouldn't have made a move to 12 to begin with, let alone being on the brink of 14 member schools.  In the end this is a move to put the Big Ten conference in the best position possible to maximize what's been a crazy five year period of a cash based arms race in major college athletics and in that world this is a move that's exactly right for the Big Ten. No doubt, you the fellow Big Ten fan will have a lot to say so comment away... or join the conversation on Twitter and Facebook, whatever your pleasure.
MORE FROM YARDBARKER:
Cult of Sport: Before there was Ezekiel Elliott, there was Eric Dickerson
GET THE YARDBARKER APP:
Ios_download En_app_rgb_wo_45
MORE FROM YARDBARKER

Art Briles sues Baylor officials for libel, slander

Giants FB has home vandalized with swastika, Trump's name

Raiders G Kelechi Osemele out Thursday with illness

Red Sox send Brewers $100 as final piece of Tyler Thornburg deal

Troy Aikman almost came out of retirement to play for the Eagles

LIKE WHAT YOU SEE?
GET THE DAILY NEWSLETTER:

Blues miss morning skate due to traffic in Brooklyn

Oregon president no fan of DC Brady Hoke

Carmelo blows off Jackson's ball hog remarks, looks 'annoyed'

Richard Sherman gives logical take on Cam Newton's benching

Sandoval's career fell 'into an abyss' after getting 'complacent'

Report: NFL believes Oakland ‘has no strong desire’ to keep the Raiders

MLB Winter Meetings, Day 4: News, notes and rumors

Sporting life: Gifts for the fan who is always on point

Matt Ryan is now Mr. Pick-Two

MLB Winter Meetings report, Day 3: News, notes and rumors

Four stinkiest games remaining on the 2016 NFL schedule

Ten young NBA players developing into stars

TailGreater: Tips for bowl travelers

Ranking the single-player modes of the 2017 sports games

The 10 best sports docs available for streaming

Box Score 12/7: The date we got to know Bo

MLB Winter Meetings report, Day 2: News, notes and rumors

Ten most intriguing non-NY6 bowl games

All Sports News
Delivered to your inbox
You'll also receive Yardbarker's daily Top 10, featuring the best sports stories from around the web. Customize your newsletter to get articles on your favorite sports and teams. And the best part? It's free!

By clicking "Sign Me Up", you have read and agreed to the Fox Sports Digital Privacy Policy and Terms of Use. You can opt out at any time. For more information, please see our Privacy Policy.
the YARDBARKER app
Get it now!
Ios_download En_app_rgb_wo_45
THE B1G TIME

MLB Winter Meetings, Day 4: News, notes and rumors

Sporting life: Gifts for the fan who is always on point

The 10 best sports docs available for streaming

Matt Ryan is now Mr. Pick-Two

MLB Winter Meetings report, Day 3: News, notes and rumors

TailGreater: Tips for bowl travelers

Ranking the single-player modes of the 2017 sports games

The five best (and worst) times athletes hosted 'SNL'

The five must-have sports games of 2016

The five 2016 Heisman finalists: How do they measure up?

Today's Best Stuff
For Publishers
Company Info
Help
Follow Yardbarker