Any grousing about how the Big East didn’t deserve three 1 seeds in the
tournament is pretty much dead and buried at this point, isn’t it?
Aside from the fact that the original argument relied exclusively on
“because it just shouldn’t be that way” rather than “because
Memphis/Duke/Oklahoma earned it more than UConn,” it’s been proven true
throughout the tournament, and especially today.
Found March 28, 2009 on
SPORTS by BROOKS:
Original Story:
3 Comments:
-
They didn't deserve 3...they deserved FOUR and Nova showed everybody why last night.
-
In my ESPN bracket I have nova beating uconn for the championship.
-
I gotta admit I was Surprised,by the results here Villanova beat Pitt was my surprise because I really thought that the Panthers would handle them..Uconn is good really good even without Jerome Dyson and to be quite honest I think People slept on them even after that 6overtime game against Syracuse,all I know Villanova and Michigan State messed up my brackets..Damn!!!
Yardbarker aggregates the latest sports news, rumors and gossip from around the web. We use proprietary algorithms to automatically categorize stories and associate photos with articles. If you feel an article was miscategorized, please email tagging@yardbarker.com.
THE BACKYARD
AROUND THE WEB
College Basketball Forum Discussions
|
|
|
|
|
Today's Best Stuff |
For BloggersJoin the Yardbarker Network (YBN) for more promotion, traffic, and money. |
Company Info |
Help |
What is Yardbarker?Yardbarker is the largest network of sports blogs and pro athlete blogs on the web. This site is the hub of the Yardbarker Network, where our editors and algorithms curate the best sports content from our network and beyond. |
