Originally posted on isportsweb.com  |  Last updated 11/17/11

The Pirates’ curious decision to forego 2 reasonably-priced option years for catcher Ryan Doumit was compounded last week

Image credit gearupforsports

when the club signed backstop Rod Barajas to a 1-year $4,000,000 contract, with a 2013 club option for $3,500,000.  Barajas is inferior to Doumit in almost every aspect.  Consider the following:

1.  Age- Doumit will be 31 in the 2012 season, Barajas 36.  Despite the “depth” GM Neal Huntington has supposedly built in this organization, it’s disconcerting that he’s still relying on Dave Littlefield-esque veterans in their mid-30′s a full 4 years into his “successful” tenure.

2.  Production- Doumit had an excellent 128 OPS+ last season, which has largely gone overlooked by both fans and the Pirates alike.  Barajas had a 97 OPS+, or slightly below average for the catching position.  But what Barajas has in power is completely nulified by his abysmal on base skills.  Barajas hasn’t had a .300+ OBP since George W. Bush was in office.  His OBP’s over the past 4 seasons are…

2011  .287   2010  .284   2009  .258   2008  .294

In fact, the only time in his career Barajas finished well over a .300 OBP was in a small sampling of 48 games for the Philadelphia Phillies in 2007.  In fact, Barajas has finished below .300 in 9 of his 11 MLB seasons (not counting 5-game stints in 1999 and 2000…when he also finished under .300).

We’re dealing with a player whose career .284 OBP is the catching equivalent of Ronny Cedeno- who the Pirates just released due to his lack of production.

3.  Defensive Ability- The major knock against Doumit is his declining play behind the plate.  Those concerns are well-warranted, although I don’t think it would be difficult to move his bat to 1B, where he has played off and on throughout his career.  But Barajas isn’t any better.  Defensive catching metrics have Barajas as the better career defender, but slightly worse in 2011.  And being 5 years older, he isn’t likely to improve.

4. Durability- Another slight on Doumit is his tendency for fluke injuries season after season.  But both Barajas and Doumit have only eclipsed 400 at bats twice in their careers (and Doumit’s is 4 years shorter).  In fairness, much of Barajas’s low at bat totals are due to his status as a backup for some of his career.  But is a 36-year old backup catcher really the solution?

 

So in summary, Barajas is older, less productive at the plate, an OBP black hole, and defensively, is just as questionable as Doumit.  So why the move?  In my mind, here’s the one number that mattered:

Doumit  $15,000,000 over 2 seasons

Barajas  $4,000,000 over 1, with a max of $7,500,000 over 2

Simply put, this was a matter of saving money on an already league-low payroll.  And we as fans are going to pay the price for that come 2012.

Thanks for reading.

 

GET THE YARDBARKER APP:
Ios_download En_app_rgb_wo_45
MORE FROM YARDBARKER

Not one, but two position players take the mound for the Padres

Report: Will Smith’s blood alcohol level three times over limit when he was fatally shot

Report: Kings’ Darren Collison arrested for domestic violence

Report: Blue Jays acquire reliever Jason Grilli from Braves

Troy Brouwer has thought about signing with the Canucks

LIKE WHAT YOU SEE?
GET THE DAILY NEWSLETTER:

Jose Bautista says Rougned Odor was looking for fight before May 16 brawl

Lionel Messi accused of $4.5 million fraud scheme

Iguodala on Durant: ‘It must be fun playing with a guy like that’

Clayton Kershaw to Jake Arrieta: Choose happiness over money

Blues head coach Ken Hitchcock announces retirement tour

Las Vegas mayor all-in on Raiders relocation

Raiders had three scuffles during OTA session

John Scott wants to form a World Cup team with snubs, including Phil Kessel

A look at who’s hot and who’s not heading into the summer tournaments

Durant, Westbrook and the right, liberated role players

GLOW (Gorgeous Ladies of Wrestling) coming to Netflix as comedy series

San Francisco Giants ask for tax breaks on AT&T Park due to dropping stadium value

Is Anderson Varejao already guaranteed a championship ring?

Why this NBA Finals rematch is different than last year

Floyd Mayweather stokes fire with mock poster for Conor McGregor fight

English Football Association commits to funding brain trauma research

Joel Embiid declares himself to be healthy in Instagram post

Klay Thompson’s dad too nervous to watch Game 7 so he watched Monday Night Raw

MLB News
Delivered to your inbox
You'll also receive Yardbarker's daily Top 10, featuring the best sports stories from around the web. Customize your newsletter to get articles on your favorite sports and teams. And the best part? It's free!

By clicking "Sign Me Up", you have read and agreed to the Fox Sports Digital Privacy Policy and Terms of Use. You can opt out at any time. For more information, please see our Privacy Policy.
the YARDBARKER app
Get it now!
Ios_download En_app_rgb_wo_45

Why this NBA Finals rematch is different than last year

Defense could play a huge role in who wins the Stanley Cup

Speedy pace of the Penguins-Sharks Stanley Cup Final

How expanded instant replay has hurt the NBA

Best regular-season NBA teams not to win a championship

Every time an NBA team came back from a 3-1 deficit (and what it means for the Warriors)

How disallowed goals can change the course of NHL games

The five most disappointing MLB teams this season

QUIZ: Identify these NHL Hall of Famers by their nicknames

QUIZ: Name every winner of the Belmont Stakes since 1867

Today's Best Stuff
For Publishers
Company Info
Help
Follow Yardbarker