Originally posted on isportsweb.com  |  Last updated 11/17/11

The Pirates’ curious decision to forego 2 reasonably-priced option years for catcher Ryan Doumit was compounded last week

Image credit gearupforsports

when the club signed backstop Rod Barajas to a 1-year $4,000,000 contract, with a 2013 club option for $3,500,000.  Barajas is inferior to Doumit in almost every aspect.  Consider the following:

1.  Age- Doumit will be 31 in the 2012 season, Barajas 36.  Despite the “depth” GM Neal Huntington has supposedly built in this organization, it’s disconcerting that he’s still relying on Dave Littlefield-esque veterans in their mid-30′s a full 4 years into his “successful” tenure.

2.  Production- Doumit had an excellent 128 OPS+ last season, which has largely gone overlooked by both fans and the Pirates alike.  Barajas had a 97 OPS+, or slightly below average for the catching position.  But what Barajas has in power is completely nulified by his abysmal on base skills.  Barajas hasn’t had a .300+ OBP since George W. Bush was in office.  His OBP’s over the past 4 seasons are…

2011  .287   2010  .284   2009  .258   2008  .294

In fact, the only time in his career Barajas finished well over a .300 OBP was in a small sampling of 48 games for the Philadelphia Phillies in 2007.  In fact, Barajas has finished below .300 in 9 of his 11 MLB seasons (not counting 5-game stints in 1999 and 2000…when he also finished under .300).

We’re dealing with a player whose career .284 OBP is the catching equivalent of Ronny Cedeno- who the Pirates just released due to his lack of production.

3.  Defensive Ability- The major knock against Doumit is his declining play behind the plate.  Those concerns are well-warranted, although I don’t think it would be difficult to move his bat to 1B, where he has played off and on throughout his career.  But Barajas isn’t any better.  Defensive catching metrics have Barajas as the better career defender, but slightly worse in 2011.  And being 5 years older, he isn’t likely to improve.

4. Durability- Another slight on Doumit is his tendency for fluke injuries season after season.  But both Barajas and Doumit have only eclipsed 400 at bats twice in their careers (and Doumit’s is 4 years shorter).  In fairness, much of Barajas’s low at bat totals are due to his status as a backup for some of his career.  But is a 36-year old backup catcher really the solution?

 

So in summary, Barajas is older, less productive at the plate, an OBP black hole, and defensively, is just as questionable as Doumit.  So why the move?  In my mind, here’s the one number that mattered:

Doumit  $15,000,000 over 2 seasons

Barajas  $4,000,000 over 1, with a max of $7,500,000 over 2

Simply put, this was a matter of saving money on an already league-low payroll.  And we as fans are going to pay the price for that come 2012.

Thanks for reading.

 

This article first appeared on isportsweb.com and was syndicated with permission.

GET THE YARDBARKER APP:
Ios_download En_app_rgb_wo_45
MORE FROM YARDBARKER

James Harden sets a new NBA record

New info shows just how much Las Vegas wants Raiders

Report: Patriots, Revis have not discussed possible reunion

Reporter: Giants 'would not go near' Adrian Peterson

Popovich: Owners interfering with player rest is risky

LIKE WHAT YOU SEE?
GET THE DAILY NEWSLETTER:

Michael Irvin weighs in on Ezekiel Elliott's recent behavior

Oregon headed to first Final Four in 78 years as Jordan Bell & Tyler Dorsey dominate Kansas

This is the Gonzaga we’ve been waiting for

Jets won’t rule out selecting another QB in 2017 NFL Draft

Rougned Odor threw a cup of water into Felix Hernandez’s face on the field

Michael Irvin rips Texans for not trading for Tony Romo

Best of Yardbarker: Did Team USA's victory save the World Baseball Classic?

The Rewind: George Mason's improbable run to the Final Four

Breaking down the Naismith Award race

Box Score 3/24: Waiting on West Virginia

Eat, Drink, Watch: Weekends are for upsets

The 'Once again, Barry Bonds is the best power hitter in San Francisco' quiz

With Team USA's victory, World Baseball Classic (finally) lived up to its potential

The NFL distraction playbook

Which Sweet 16 team should you be rooting for?

The Aesthetic: The world of player exclusive sneakers

Lingering issues for each 2016 MLB postseason team

Box Score 3/23: Team USA wins their first WBC title

MLB News
Delivered to your inbox
You'll also receive Yardbarker's daily Top 10, featuring the best sports stories from around the web. Customize your newsletter to get articles on your favorite sports and teams. And the best part? It's free!

By clicking "Sign Me Up", you have read and agreed to the Fox Sports Digital Privacy Policy and Terms of Use. You can opt out at any time. For more information, please see our Privacy Policy.
the YARDBARKER app
Get it now!
Ios_download En_app_rgb_wo_45

Best of Yardbarker: Did Team USA's victory save the World Baseball Classic?

The Rewind: George Mason's improbable run to the Final Four

Breaking down the Naismith Award race

Eat, Drink, Watch: Weekends are for upsets

The 'Once again, Barry Bonds is the best power hitter in San Francisco' quiz

The NFL distraction playbook

With Team USA's victory the WBC (finally) lived up to its potential

The Aesthetic: The world of player exclusive sneakers

Which Sweet 16 team should you be rooting for?

NBA Referee Hotline Bling: Steph Curry pushes OKC's buttons

Today's Best Stuff
For Publishers
Company Info
Help
Follow Yardbarker