Found June 09, 2009 on
MVN:
Normal
0
false
false
false
MicrosoftInternetExplorer4
/* Style Definitions */
table.MsoNormalTable
{mso-style-name:"Table Normal";
mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0;
mso-tstyle-colband-size:0;
mso-style-noshow:yes;
mso-style-parent:"";
mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt;
mso-para-margin:0in;
mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt;
mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman";
mso-ansi-language:#0400;
mso-fareast-language:#0400;
mso-bidi-language:#0400;}
As a side note, I'm
very sorry for the extended delay in posting on Home of the Chiefs. We will get
back to a regular posting schedule soon as more action heats up with minicamps,
but I've been swamped with my actual job and other obligations at home. Without
making too much a fuss about it, let's get on with today's post.
Chiefs fans always seem to have perpetually high
expectations, which is ironic, since our traditionally bad baseball team has a
championship more recently than our football team, despite this being a
"football town."
Given the renovations at Arrowhead and the new regime in
town, what kind of expectations are reasonable?
I'm gonna lay it down now and say this Chiefs team wins no
more than seven games this year. Then again, we have no idea given the relative
media blackout with this team, so they could surprise. They could also be duds.
Let's look on both sides of the ball.
Last year, the Chiefs ranked 20th in the league
in passing yards with 195.6 per game, and 16th in the league with 113.1
yards per game. Yet the scoring offense was 26th in the league,
averaging 18.2 points per game. Tony Gonzalez accounted for about 20% of their
scoring (seriously, that's even counting the kicker... so of offensive players,
his number is assuredly much higher, but this writer is too busy to dig that
hard), and was arguably their best threat to score touchdowns. He's gone now.
On the flip side, Larry Johnson (off-field aside) had a
productive season of 4.5 yards / carry. It's obvious that LJ still "has it,"
and Jamaal Charles is definitely an acceptable alternative (5.3 yards / carry).
The ground game, which frustrated fans so much last year, is essential to any
winning ballclub. Matt Cassell will surely be a better passer, but I worry about his targets. I don't think this club's problem is productivity when it comes to gaining yardage, but
meaningful productivity. This team was awful at converting 3rd downs
(82/214 = 38.3%, almost 10% less than opponents averaged against the Chiefs.
Considering teams will typically see more than 10 3rd downs in a
game, that's a significant swing every game).They never seemed to have "big plays" or score touchdowns in key situations.
Not only that, but the defense wasn't good at all last year. 234 yards passing, 159
yards rushing... 393 yards and 27.5 points per game. That's bad. That's real bad.
10 sacks was bad. We're not going to live in the past, but there are two
schools of thought to what caused the Chiefs' problems - coaching and talent.
Did the Chiefs have significant talent last year? Not really. The Chiefs do not
have a marquee defensive player or a bona fide defensive leader who stands out
for performance on top of ability. Adding the aging Zach Thomas and obtaining Mike
Vrabel (he doesn't even seem like he wants to be here) doesn't seem to be a fix.
A team is the sum of its parts. The Chiefs now have to hope
for a superior freshman effort from Todd Haley (who was an offensive specialist, not a defensive whiz), because the talent level on
this team isn't there. The media loves to cover words like "leadership" and
veteran presence. To an extent, I can buy a need for that. But the Chiefs are
going to be under the cap and need to add one more legitimate deep threat and a
couple marquee defenders. After all, in recent times, the only "offensive" team
that has made a championship was the Indianapolis Colts. Defense wins
championships. Switching to a 3-4 may afford some change, but until the talent
falls into place, it's not enough to make up for an abysmal defense.
The best thing I hope for this year is an average team. A 7 win
season would be a strong sign that these Chiefs might be ready to compete in Haley's second and third years, but I'm not gonna hold my breath for this (we'll take a look at the schedule in a future post). I
think it's more reasonable to expect a little less, since this is Todd Haley
and Scott Pioli's first years, but last year's team was capable of winning 5-6 more
games, so I think this year's team should be moderately better, if not only because
the Chiefs have a relatively young roster which now has some vital NFL
experience.
But are there any fans left to care? More on that in my next
post.
Original Story:
http://mvn.com/homeofthechiefs/2009/0...
THE BACKYARD
BEST OF MAXIM
AROUND THE WEB
NFL Forum Discussions
66 replies,
5 hours ago
1 replies,
7 hours ago
90 replies,
3 days ago
| Latest Rumors |
|
|
|
|
Today's Best Stuff |
For BloggersJoin the Yardbarker Network (YBN) for more promotion, traffic, and money. |
Company Info |
Help |
What is Yardbarker?Yardbarker is the largest network of sports blogs and pro athlete blogs on the web. This site is the hub of the Yardbarker Network, where our editors and algorithms curate the best sports content from our network and beyond. |












