Originally written on Buffalo Wins  |  Last updated 11/4/14
As the NFL Draft quickly approaches, we scour the Internet for as many mock drafts as we can find. We like one, hate another, and hope another would never happen, but what are they all about? Is there any value in mock drafts other than pure entertainment? What about the actual drafts, what are the biggest “reach” and “value” picks? Do those labels (and the ratings they’re based on) even matter? Mel Kiper, Jr. and Don Banks have become two of the industry experts when it comes to mock drafts. Their final first round mock drafts have included 81% of the players actually chosen in the first rounds since 2009. However, they have only gotten 17% of the exact picks correct in that period of time. The experts, as well as the thousands of aspiring draftniks, know who should be selected in the first round but they don’t always know where they’ll go. Accuracy at the top of the draft is very high, but the precision quickly drops off due to unexpected decisions and trades. The table below shows Kiper and Banks’ accuracy by draft position since 2009. Kiper and Banks have a combined 39 players in their first round mock drafts for 2013. The only quarterback that appears in both drafts is Geno Smith.  Clearly there’s a bit of group think in these mock drafts. In the four mock drafts currently showcased on NFL.com’s draft page, there are only 44 unique choices after removing all of the duplicates. There were a total of 128 mock picks in those four mock drafts. These mock drafts are usually created based on overall rankings (which are probably from a limited number of sources) and actual team valuation isn’t taken into much consideration. That’s probably a large reason why recent mock drafts have the Bills selecting a guard at eighth overall. (Remember when the Bills had a “need” at tackle yet chose Gilmore at tenth last year, only to grab Glenn in the second round? The Bills decision-makers like selecting impact players from impact positions. My guess is they rank players on their “big board” accordingly.) Most Bills fans want nothing to do with an offensive lineman at eighth overall and want Buddy to find us the new franchise quarterback, if he exists. If the Bills were to choose a quarterback, most analysts would call it a “reach” pick. But teams rarely pick on par with the published rankings. I determined “reach” picks by calculating the difference between Football’s Future prospect rankings and their draft position. The average value of “reach” and “value” picks since the 2009 draft are in the graph below. “Reach” picks are negative (picked earlier than expected), “value” picks are positive (picked later than expected). As the graph shows, the average value or reach of each pick is pretty random. That emphasizes the fact that teams value positions and players differently than the “experts” creating the prospect rankings or mock drafts. To further that point, the top twenty reach picks (largest difference between their “draft value” and their actual place in the draft) since 2009 are in the table below. Those reach players are a mixed bag. There are some lingering question marks in that group (Larry English- four games started since 2009, James Carpenter- torn ACL in 2011, Jake Locker- named and unnamed a starter a billion times per my last count, and Tim Tebow- no explanation needed). There are some solid players (Cam Newton, Eric Wood when healthy, Ryan Mathews before last season).  Then there are those that the jury is still out on (Ryan Tannehill and Brandon Weeden). Reach players aren’t necessarily mean bad players. Using FootballsFuture.com’s rankings for this year’s draft prospects, Matt Barkley would have a reach value of 9. Geno Smith would be a reach by 10 spots if the Bills chose them with their eighth pick. Neither would have been a top-twenty “reach” in the last four drafts. Of course this rankings system called Cam Newton a reach by 14 spots in 2011, which we all know is a bit ridiculous. Speaking of ridiculous, that 2011 ranking had Blaine Gabbert at eight and JJ Watt at 14. Watt was the defensive player of the year and Blaine Gabbert is about to be run out of Jacksonville. So the mock drafts are really only good at telling us who will go in the first round and the overall prospect rankings are pretty flawed but still interesting. If Buffalo selects a quarterback at eight on Thursday, we can expect criticisms screaming “REACH!” or “they should’ve waited until the second round!” But the only true risk of selecting a player higher than they are ranked is missing out on an impact player that won’t be around for your second pick. That’s when Buffalo will weight their opportunity cost: is there a bigger drop off from their desired quarterback(s) than their top-tier and second-tier positional players? My guess is that the quarterback opportunity cost is greater, and Buffalo will fill their need at quarterback in the first round. Either way, I don’t want to hear about reaching for a quarterback. It’s mostly hot air.
GET THE YARDBARKER APP:
Ios_download En_app_rgb_wo_45
MORE FROM YARDBARKER

Robert Kraft: Richard Sherman is a 'marketing whiz'

Rob Gronkowski's party bus headed to Super Bowl

Matt Barnes not happy with NBA for $25,000 fine

Brandon Browner: 'No hard feelings' with Sherman, Thomas

Gronk reads erotica, sings Katy Perry at SB Media Day

LIKE WHAT YOU SEE?
GET THE DAILY NEWSLETTER:

Governor donates $10K to UNM hoops star’s cancer charity

U.S. Soccer: Hope Solo needs to do 'number of things' to return

K.J. Wright: Targeting injured players 'unacceptable'

Five reasons the Patriots will win the Super Bowl

Five reasons the Seahawks will win the Super Bowl

Bill Simmons fires a shot at ESPN colleague Ray Lewis

Joe Biden blows off Olivia Munn to talk to Aaron Rodgers

James Shields need to adjust his contract expectations

Kurt Warner wonders about Patriots cheating in Super Bowl

4-star QB recruit decommits from Michigan

Top storylines for Super Bowl XLIX

WATCH: Pacquiao, Mayweather meet at halftime of Heat game

One of Tom Brady's ‘treats’ is avocado ice cream

Does MLB need more offense in the modern game?

Re-ranking the Top 25: exposing the biggest flaws

Tiger on wearing mask: ‘Not a lot of brown dudes at ski races’

Putting the Cleveland Cavaliers’ pieces together

Brodeur to retire immediately and join Blues front office

NFL News
Delivered to your inbox
You'll also receive Yardbarker's daily Top 10, featuring the best sports stories from around the web. Customize your newsletter to get articles on your favorite sports and teams. And the best part? It's free!

By clicking "Sign Me Up", you have read and agreed to the Fox Sports Digital Privacy Policy and Terms of Use. You can opt out at any time. For more information, please see our Privacy Policy.
the YARDBARKER app
Get it now!
Ios_download En_app_rgb_wo_45

Top storylines for Super Bowl XLIX

Barnes unhappy with NBA over fine

Does MLB need more offense in the modern game?

Re-ranking the Top 25: exposing the biggest flaws

Putting the Cavs’ pieces together

Super Bowl XLIX: Key people to know

Ranking all 48 Super Bowls

Bill Simmons fires a shot at Ray Lewis

NFL pushing CFP to change schedule

Can Yanks not pay A-Rod his bonuses?

Petition started to remove Pats from SB

On John Wall's adidas J Wall 1 NYC All-Star Edition

Today's Best Stuff
For Bloggers

Join the Yardbarker Network for more promotion, traffic, and money.

Company Info
Help
What is Yardbarker?

Yardbarker is the largest network of sports blogs and pro athlete blogs on the web. This site is the hub of the Yardbarker Network, where our editors and algorithms curate the best sports content from our network and beyond.