Originally posted on Football Nation  |  Last updated 6/29/12

FOXBORO, MA - JANUARY 20: Robert Kraft, team owner of the New England Patriots addresses the fans as he receives the Lamar Hunt AFC Championship trophy from CBS announcer Jim Nantz against the San Diego Chargers during the AFC Championship Game on January 20, 2008 at Gillette Stadium in Foxboro, Massachusetts. (Photo by Chris McGrath/Getty Images)
This week Robert Kraft, owner of the New England Patriots, is on a promotional tour in Europe was quoted as saying, “ I personally think we should have a franchise in London, and that is something I am going to push for," Kraft said, according to SkySports.com. "I think I said that the last time we were over here in 2009 and before this next decade is out, I hope we have a team here. I think that would be right for the NFL, and this fan base has proven they deserve it.”

However, I disagree with Robert Craft, and this article explains why the NFL should not have a permanent franchise in London.

Starting in the 1920’s several football leagues and teams came together to form the American Professional Football Conference which would later become the National Football League. It is called the National Football League because it features only teams in America, and because it really has become America’s game.

I understand the thrill of playing a game or two each season overseas or trying to use football as a means of improving international relations but a permanent franchise in London would only undermine America’s game, and I do not want to watch a league called the International Football League.

Besides changing the name of the league would change the initials which would mean people would have to stop using the No Fun League and come up with new jokes against the league.

Los Angeles  
The possibility of moving the Minnesota Vikings to Los Angeles reopened the discussion about the need of bringing a NFL team back to the Los Angeles market. So if NFL fans are so passionate about bringing a team back to Los Angeles why is there even a discussion about moving a franchise or starting a franchise overseas?

Los Angeles would be a better location for a team because it is still in the United States, and  it would be in a major fan and television market, and would probably last longer and make more money for the league than a team in London.

Attendance has been good in the yearly game held in London over the past few years, but I do not know if attendance for an American game would hold if there were six or eight games there a year.

NFL Europe 
If we need another reason why a franchise in London is a bad idea, look no further than NFL Europe. Starting out as the World League of American Football, the league started out in 1991 as a type of spring football league. The league ran for two seasons before taking two seasons off and returned as the World League, and would eventually be known as NFL Europe and NFL Europa.  

The league would run from 1995 through 2007 and would serve as developmental league, or as a league for players who did not quite have what it took to be in the NFL. In 2007 the league was disbanded in favor of focusing on NFL regular season games overseas.

Ultimately though part of the reason that NFL Europe failed because it is an American sport that did not catch on in the soccer dominated European world.

Having a franchise based in London would cost the league money in having to consistently have teams fly back and forth across continents, while also having to house away teams and American players, and coaches for the duration of the season.

Ios_download En_app_rgb_wo_45

LeBron James reportedly will not waive no-trade clause

Jerry Jones weighs in on NFL's Ezekiel Elliott investigation

McFadden missed Cowboys charter flight to training camp

LaVar Ball pulls entire AAU team from floor, forfeits game

Report: Mayweather's GF being harassed by McGregor fans


Pablo Sandoval apologizes for comments about Giants

LeBron James seems to respond to Kyrie Irving's trade request

Senator jokes that President Trump should nominate Tom Brady for ambassadorship

Report: Cubs interested in Rangers catcher Jonathan Lucroy

Marc-Andre Fleury took Stanley Cup on a road trip, protected it well

Report: Irving believes LeBron leaked word of trade request

Sports & Politics Intersect: Trump casts shadow over U.S. Women's Open

Best of Yardbarker: General managers take the spotlight

The 'Pay that man his money' quiz

The unexpected rise of the Connecticut Sun

The National League Wild Card is suddenly relevant again

Kicking It: USMNT struggles to find consistency in Gold Cup as World Cup qualifying nears

Three Up, Three Down: The Dodgers are a complete juggernaut right now

BIG3 Week 5: Pivotal make-or-break weekend in Chicago

Who won the Open Championship in the year you were born?

Making an NFL GM change in the summer has its benefits

Box Score 7/21: Stay cool this weekend sports fans

The 'Let's show a little love for James Jones' quiz

NFL News
Delivered to your inbox
You'll also receive Yardbarker's daily Top 10, featuring the best sports stories from around the web. Customize your newsletter to get articles on your favorite sports and teams. And the best part? It's free!

By clicking "Sign Me Up", you have read and agreed to the Yardbarker Privacy Policy and Terms of Service. You can opt out at any time. For more information, please see our Privacy Policy.
Get it now!
Ios_download En_app_rgb_wo_45

Sports & Politics Intersect: Trump casts shadow over U.S. Women's Open

The National League Wild Card is suddenly relevant again

The 'Pay that man his money' quiz

BIG3 Week 5: Pivotal make-or-break weekend in Chicago

The 'Let's show a little love for James Jones' quiz

Making an NFL GM change in the summer has its benefits

The 'Yoan Moncada era starts now' quiz

The Orioles need to unwind past deals if they are going to rebuild

BIG3 Referee Hotline Bling: Sam Hinkie is calling the shots

The 'No one is betterer than Roger Federer' quiz

Today's Best Stuff
For Publishers
Company Info
Follow Yardbarker