Originally posted on Seahawk Addicts  |  Last updated 11/11/11
Seattle_news_192b

I'm pretty sure this isn't news to anyone, but penalties have been killing the Seahawks.  False starts, neutral zone infractions, defensive pass interference, unnecessary roughness -- you name it, the Seahawks have been penalized for it.  According to Pete Carroll and others, the reason for the increase in penalties this season is the team's youth and lack of experience.  As explanations go, this one has the benefit of sounding like a reasonable, valid answer.  It just seems logical that inexperienced players would make more mistakes, which in turn would lead to more penalties being assessed.

But do the stats bear that out?  Is there an inverse relationship between a team's experience and the number of penalties they commit, or is there an explanation that better fits the data?  To find out, I started off by looking at stats for the last ten full NFL seasons, 2001 - 2010, although I ended up ignoring 2010 after I discovered some errors in Pro Football Reference's numbers for that season.  Not that it really mattered, because after a week's worth of crunching numbers I'm left with very little of substance to show for all my work.

What I can tell you is that there does not appear to be any significant correlation between the number of penalties a team incurs and the average number of years of NFL experience for each player on the team.  The same goes for the average age of the players, who the head coach was (which is good news for Carroll), the team's win-loss record, or the number of rookies in the starting lineup.  Looking at average years of NFL experience for just the starters on each team was slightly more promising1.  More experienced starting lineups appeared to get penalized less often than younger ones, but not consistently enough to definitely point to experience as a significant factor.  In short, I've got nothin'.

So as far as I can tell, it may sound reasonable to guess that there's a connection between the experience level of a team and the number of penalties the players rack up, but the stats do not seem to back up that assumption.  It's entirely possible that I simply didn't examine a wide enough range of seasons for a pattern to emerge, but just examining '01 through '09 involved working out averages for 280+ starting lineups, and as it turns out that's pretty much the limit of how much of this sort of thing I'm willing to do in my spare time.  If anyone else decides they want to go to the trouble of taking a more in-depth look at the data available, more power to you -- I'd love to know what you discover, if anything -- but I think I've had enough of sifting through penalty stats for awhile.

 

1 I included every player who started for at least 6 games, i.e. over 1/3 of the regular season.

GET THE YARDBARKER APP:
Ios_download En_app_rgb_wo_45
MORE FROM YARDBARKER

Lionel Messi’s suspension puts Argentina in danger of missing World Cup

Report: Chris Long signs one-year deal with Eagles

Witten signs four-year extension with Cowboys

Stan Van Gundy: Georgetown should go all-out to hire Ewing

Hue Jackson: Browns are not interested in Colin Kaepernick

LIKE WHAT YOU SEE?
GET THE DAILY NEWSLETTER:

Report: 'Strong belief' Jay Cutler won't play in 2017

Falcons GM wants to change OT rules after SB loss to Patriots

LaVar Ball reportedly shopping reality TV projects

Report: Cowboys likely to release Romo before OTAs

Report: Rule banning leaping FG blocks expected to pass

Top eight takeways from Raiders’ relocation to Las Vegas

Box Score 3/28: Wilt's last game

Best, worst and hard to stomach MLB offseason moves

The 28 craziest ballpark foods for the 2017 season

The Rewind: George Mason's improbable run to the Final Four

Baseball movies you can stream now to hold you over until Opening Day

Best of Yardbarker: Did Team USA's victory save the World Baseball Classic?

Breaking down the Naismith Award race

Box Score 3/24: Waiting on West Virginia

Eat, Drink, Watch: Weekends are for upsets

The 'Once again, Barry Bonds is the best power hitter in San Francisco' quiz

With Team USA's victory, World Baseball Classic (finally) lived up to its potential

The NFL distraction playbook

NFL News
Delivered to your inbox
You'll also receive Yardbarker's daily Top 10, featuring the best sports stories from around the web. Customize your newsletter to get articles on your favorite sports and teams. And the best part? It's free!

By clicking "Sign Me Up", you have read and agreed to the Fox Sports Digital Privacy Policy and Terms of Use. You can opt out at any time. For more information, please see our Privacy Policy.
the YARDBARKER app
Get it now!
Ios_download En_app_rgb_wo_45

Best, worst and hard to stomach MLB offseason moves

The Rewind: George Mason's improbable run to the Final Four

Baseball movies you can stream now to hold you over until Opening Day

Best of Yardbarker: Did Team USA's victory save the World Baseball Classic?

Breaking down the Naismith Award race

Eat, Drink, Watch: Weekends are for upsets

The 'Once again, Barry Bonds is the best power hitter in San Francisco' quiz

The NFL distraction playbook

With Team USA's victory the WBC (finally) lived up to its potential

The Aesthetic: The world of player exclusive sneakers

Today's Best Stuff
For Publishers
Company Info
Help
Follow Yardbarker