Found September 14, 2009 on
Bleacher Report:
Ok Raider nation... All is looking well, we just got an outstanding defender and five time Pro-Bowler to help bolster our questionable d-line.
But one problem. How does a 6'6'' 310 pound 3-4 defensive end fit into a 4-3?
I'm sorry but this trade really threw me off.
Do the Raiders play Burgess at D-end? Well at his size he will likely only be used in running situations and that doesn't bode well for him if he really plans on being the guy on top of the QB.
If he does play D-end he will likely take over Jay Richardson's spot being subed out for Trevor Scott on passing downs.
Does he play the 3-technique D-tackle spot. He's an ideal build, but that job is already taken by Tommy Kelly who actually does a pretty good job.
If he were to play that would send a definate message to Kelly. With Kelly and Seymour rotating in at the 3-technique we would definately get max production out of the position. Only problem is we are still neglecting the one or ze...
Original Story:
http://bleacherreport.com/articles/25...
THE BACKYARD
BEST OF MAXIM
AROUND THE WEB
NFL Forum Discussions
1 replies,
1 hour ago
95 replies,
3 hours ago
1 replies,
17 hours ago
90 replies,
3 days ago
| Latest Rumors |
|
|
|
|
Today's Best Stuff |
For BloggersJoin the Yardbarker Network (YBN) for more promotion, traffic, and money. |
Company Info |
Help |
What is Yardbarker?Yardbarker is the largest network of sports blogs and pro athlete blogs on the web. This site is the hub of the Yardbarker Network, where our editors and algorithms curate the best sports content from our network and beyond. |












