Originally written on The Rangers Tribune  |  Last updated 11/8/14

It's tough to criticize a hockey team immediately after they've been eliminated from the Stanley Cup Playoffs, especially when that team made it as far as the Eastern Conference Finals to beat out any and all expectations set for them at the beginning of the season. This is why I waited a day to sort of spill my feelings out on the blog about the hockey we've just watched for the past two months; specifically the past two weeks against the New Jersey Devils.

The Blueshirts have every right to be proud of themselves and walk away with their heads held high after their 2011-12 campaign, which ended just two games short of the Stanley Cup Finals, and that's something I was quick to point out in Friday's postgame. However, there are reasons why they did not reach their goal this season, and why the front office will be scrambling to make some changes over the summer to better prepare this team for a Cup run. 

I'm going to be quite blunt when I say this: The Rangers did not deserve to be in the Stanley Cup Finals. Before you jump down my throat, please here me out. 

Was there a single game of the twenty that the Rangers were a part of in the postseason that you felt you were watching the 2012 Stanley Cup Champions? Was there a game in which the Rangers looked like the best team in hockey and near unstoppable? Was there a game in these playoffs that the Rangers dominated their opponent for a complete sixty minutes? 

There's a good chance you answered "no" to all three of those questions, or at least two of the three. As much as some fans will be reluctant to admit this, it's the truth and it became more and more clear the further the Rangers ventured. And, by all means, this is not a bad thing. The Rangers were the youngest team in the playoffs, yet still made it to the final four and came two games short of the final two. The journey was well worth it just for the experience put under the belt of the franchise and their younger players. 

But still, it was rather obvious that this hockey team was no powerhouse prepared to steamroll opponents like the Los Angeles Kings. This hockey team was not going to oust an opponent with its depth or skill. They planned to outwork their opponent, which can only be fully effective for so long because of the fatigue factor that comes into play during the postseason. 

Plain and simple, the Rangers were exhausted by the time they reached the Devils and the Conference Finals, and there was no way, at that point, they were going to find a way to match the depth of their cross-river rivals. The Devils, I don't think, are given enough credit for how solid of a hockey club they actually are, which is something I noted in my series preview before Game 1. They have one of the more deep offensive lineups in the entire National Hockey League. 

Meanwhile, the offensively challenged Rangers struggled to generate a consistent forecheck, challenge opposing goalies or score three or more goals throughout the playoffs. Their most consistent forward on a nightly basis had to be rookie Chris Kreider, because the top guys were anything but consistent in the playoffs. Marian Gaborik was never the threat that Alex Ovechkin or Ilya Kovalchuk were for their respective teams. Brad Richards played arguably the worst six games of his life in the past series against the Devils. Derek Stepan scored just one goal in 20 playoff games. This is unacceptable and killed the Rangers' chances of going all the way. 

When you break it down series by series, the Rangers arguably wouldn't have gotten through the first round without Brian Boyle's production, and the same could be said of Chris Kreider's in the second round. There's nothing wrong with those guys being the ones to step up, but when you're relying on a rookie and a grinder to carry you offensively, it's going to be a real battle to reach the sacred sixteen wins needed to bring home some hardware. 

Looking at the Devils, they had four functioning lines that their head coach rolled through without having to favorite any one trio. Their fourth line, at times, was more effective than their first. The Rangers, meanwhile, weren't get much of anything from their top two lines, let alone their bottom two. They had no answer for the depth of the Devils, and that was the cause of their eventual downfall. 

This, in turn, makes GM Glen Sather's objective for the offseason quite clear. The Rangers need to rid themselves of some dead weight in the offensive lineup and replace it with productive scorers. John Mitchell, Brian Boyle, Brandon Dubinsky, Mike Rupp and maybe even Ruslan Fedotenko are all fair game. All five of those players, by no coincidence, are depth players in the bottom six. I'm perfectly fine with the top two lines, because those will continue to grow though youth and experience. The core offense is set and built. The surrounding depth, however, should be torn up and rebuilt if this team wants to go for it all in the coming seasons. 

Now whether that is by adding from within the organization or reaching from outside is the decision of Mr. Sather. But either way, the offensive depth of the New York Rangers will be the main focus of the offseason, and those last six games against the Devils are living proof as to why. 

GET THE YARDBARKER APP:
Ios_download En_app_rgb_wo_45
MORE FROM YARDBARKER

Report: Eagles, Jets will make trade for Marcus Mariota

Cam Newton not a person of interest in night club shooting

Should Texans consider moving on from Arian Foster?

Dice-K begins comeback bid, makes first start in Japan

Report: Teams think Suh to Dolphins is ‘done' deal

LIKE WHAT YOU SEE?
GET THE DAILY NEWSLETTER:

Adrian Peterson still has ‘concerns’ about Vikings

LSU S blasts Tigers fans for leaving game early

Nobody’s safe in the NFL and nothing is sacred

UMass to retire jersey in honor of John Calipari

Houston Texans are moving on from Andre Johnson

Top landing spots for Darrelle Revis

Marijuana and MLB's Joint Drug Agreement

Twelve unlikely players who could be NCAA Tourney heroes

WATCH: CP3 goes nuts after DeAndre Jordan doesn't shoot

WATCH: Ridiculous foul called on Penn State

WATCH: Westbrook throws down huge dunk in return

Cowboys hang out at Duke game, pose with funny poster

Report: Peyton Manning's contract incentives tied to Super Bowl

Bean responds to Murphy's homosexuality comments

Haynesworth to Suh: Skins ‘took my love away from the game’

Five teams that should consider signing JaVale McGee

MLB local streaming is unlikely for Opening Day

Ronaldo sends his hair stylist to check on his wax figure monthly

NHL News
Delivered to your inbox
You'll also receive Yardbarker's daily Top 10, featuring the best sports stories from around the web. Customize your newsletter to get articles on your favorite sports and teams. And the best part? It's free!

By clicking "Sign Me Up", you have read and agreed to the Fox Sports Digital Privacy Policy and Terms of Use. You can opt out at any time. For more information, please see our Privacy Policy.
the YARDBARKER app
Get it now!
Ios_download En_app_rgb_wo_45

Pot and MLB's Joint Drug Agreement

Unlikely NCAA Tourney heroes

Every starting QB ranked by mobility

WATCH: CP3 goes nuts

UFC must make Rousey vs. Cyborg happen

Suh to Dolphins a 'done' deal?

Why haven't brands shown love to James Harden?

Nobody’s safe in the NFL and nothing is sacred

Tim Lincecum’s last best chance

Ten most underrated players in the NBA

Stevens: LeBron looks like the MVP

Spiller: EJ Manuel learned not to be 'buddy buddy' with everyone

Today's Best Stuff
For Bloggers

Join the Yardbarker Network for more promotion, traffic, and money.

Company Info
Help
What is Yardbarker?

Yardbarker is the largest network of sports blogs and pro athlete blogs on the web. This site is the hub of the Yardbarker Network, where our editors and algorithms curate the best sports content from our network and beyond.