Denver Broncos quarterbacks Drew Lock, Brett Rypien and Jeff Driskel.  Isaiah J. Downing-USA TODAY Sports

Many fans have been wondering why the Denver Broncos were forced to play without a quarterback in their Week 12 game against the New Orleans Saints on Sunday, while the Baltimore Ravens continued to have their game postponed. It’s a very good question, and it has a reasonable explanation.

The short answer is that the NFL believed the Broncos’ COVID situation was contained, while the Ravens’ was not.

ESPN’s Adam Schefter offered an explanation during “Monday Night Countdown.”

“It’s all about identification, isolation, and then containment of the virus. As long as the NFL feels like it has identified, isolated and contained the virus, it believes it can play the games,” Schefter said. “If it can’t identify, if it can’t isolate, and it can’t contain — as was the case in Baltimore — they’re going to continue to postpone the game. That’s why the Broncos-Saints game on Sunday was played. Because the league believed the virus was identified, isolated and contained in Denver, whereas it wasn’t in Baltimore. And that’s why that game keeps shifting.”

The decision to postpone or cancel a game is not based on competitive reasons. It's simply about containment of the virus. 

The Broncos had one positive COVID-19 test, and that was for quarterback Jeff Driskel on Thursday. The league on Saturday ruled the team’s other three quarterbacks ineligible to play, as they were deemed high-risk contacts as a result. There were no other players deemed at high risk, nor other positive tests. Contrarily, the Ravens continued to have new positive COVID-19 tests trickle in each day, suggesting the virus had not been contained.

As far as the league is concerned, as long as they believe the virus is contained, then it becomes the team’s responsibility to field a roster. In that sense, losing a player to COVID is not too dissimilar to losing one to injury. 

Remember, even though Baltimore’s game against Pittsburgh has been postponed from Thursday to Wednesday, they will still be playing without Lamar Jackson, though they may get some other key weapons back.

More must-reads:

TODAY'S BEST
Mets' Kodai Senga diagnosed with triceps inflammation, shut down
Watch: Luka Doncic hits game-winning three-pointer as Mavs take 2-0 lead over Wolves
Rangers outlast Panthers in Game 2 to even series
Yankees star Juan Soto has eyebrow-raising comments on upcoming free agency
Bears defender shares advice he gave QB Caleb Williams after 'frustrating' day
NCAA settlement might make college athletics more competitive
Jets QB Aaron Rodgers insists focus has been football, not politics
Heartbreak for Heim, Honeycutt as Sanchez wins Truck Series race at Charlotte
Draymond Green shares tone-deaf take on fines from NBA
USWNT coach Emma Hayes instilling right mindset ahead of Olympics
Winnipeg Jets officially name head coach
Injury bug bites Orioles again as another starting pitcher lands on IL
Yankees' Hal Steinbrenner under fire over Juan Soto comments
Lonzo Ball shares eye-opening details about his knee injury
Hurricanes general manager steps down, leaving front office in flux
Travis Kelce echoes Patrick Mahomes in response to controversial kicker
Cowboys QB Trey Lance details how he has changed since 49ers stint
Historic NCAA settlement reached allowing schools to pay players
Celtics dominate Pacers in Game 2, take 2-0 ECF lead
Cavaliers fire head coach J.B. Bickerstaff

Want more sports news?

Join the hundreds of thousands of fans who start their day with Yardbarker's Morning Bark, the best newsletter in sports.