Originally written on Madtown Badgers  |  Last updated 11/20/14
Earlier today we gave you a report that multiple outlets in Madison are reporting that current Boise State head coach Chris Petersen is going to interview at Wisconsin on Monday and after that people began speculating and wondering if he would actually be a fit. It seems as though there's a perception that Boise State runs a spread offense that's heavy on passing over rushing and they don't use a power offense. So, your's truly decided to dive into that subject and as someone that watches a lot of college football, not just the Badgers or the Big Ten the thought that Boise State runs the spread couldn't be further from the truth. But, don't take my word for it, let's break down Wisconsin's offense vs. Boise State's offense: The Rushing Game:     Wisconsin Rushing Stats     Year Carries Yards Average/Rush TD's 2006 536 2,102 3.9 24 2007 587 2,610 4.4 29 2008 567 2,745 4.8 31 2009 581 2,650 4.6 33 2010 584 3,194 5.5 48 2011 609 3,298 5.4 48 2012 590 3,091 5.2 37       Boise State Rushing Stats     Year Carries Yards Average/Rush TD's 2006 551 2,784 5.1 39 2007 518 2,404 4.6 35 2008 449 1,980 4.4 28 2009 508 2,606 5.1 30 2010 486 2,603 5.4 34 2011 492 2,235 4.5 31 2012 442 2,077 4.7 25 What's interesting about all of these numbers we just threw at you? How about over the course of 7 years the Badgers and Broncos both average 4.8 yards a carry. So, while the Broncos average about 87 fewer carries a season they are more efficient with their rushing game than the Badgers have been through the 7 year span of Petersen and Bielema at the helm of these two programs. The only difference that's a bit glaring is that the Badgers average 4 more TD's a year rushing a year- so 28 more points from their rushing game per year.  So, perhaps the perception that Boise State is just going spread you out and throw the ball all over the place is a bit off. In fact the Broncos average 76 more rushing plays than passing over the course of a season where as the Badgers average 260.6 more carries than passing attempts.  Does that mean Petersen would come in and try to switch up the Badgers offense? No, but what it may mean is that the Badgers Pro-Style offense could become a lot, A LOT more balanced. The Passing Game:       Wisconsin Passing Stats   Year Attempts Yards Average TD's Efficiency Rating 2006 331 2,749 211.5 21 144.2 2007 347 2,704 208 17 132.6 2008 333 2,445 188.1 11 120 2009 340 2,770 213.1 16 141 2010 276 2,593 199.5 17 168.1 2011 328 3,280 234.3 34 186.2 2012 274 2,114 162.6 14 136.4       Boise State Passing Stats   Year Attempts Yards Average/Game TD's Efficiency Rating 2006 306 2,684 206.5 25 161.4 2007 460 3,672 282.5 34 152.97 2008 438 3,751 288.5 30 157.55 2009 458 3,698 264.1 40 159.5 2010 424 4,174 321 38 180 2011 477 4,022 309.4 45 171.6 2012 355 2,603 216.9 17 139.9 This is where things really change between Petersen's offense and what the Badgers threw out on the field over the past 7 seasons. We'll get more into the meaning behind these numbers in our next section, but this has to be exciting for the quarterbacks at Wisconsin because they'll get a chance to throw the ball more, of course if Petersen is here - and for purposes of this exercise that's what we've got to assume. If you are looking at this the two numbers that really stick out are the TD's and the QB efficiency numbers. Why do I pick out the efficiency numbers? Because it shows that no matter the number of times a QB is throwing the football he's going to more often or not be making smart decisions with the football and even if the Badgers average 50 more passes a season under Peterson there's going to be a much more potent offense on hand in Madison and that's exciting to think about. Total Plays:     Wisconsin Offense Year Total Plays Plays/Game 2006 867 66.7 2007 934 71.8 2008 900 69.2 2009 921 70.8 2010 860 66.1 2011 937 66.9 2012 864 66.4     Boise State Offense Year Total Plays Plays/Game 2006 857 65.9 2007 978 75.2 2008 887 68.2 2009 966 69 2010 910 69.2 2011 969 74.5 2012 797 66.4 Now these numbers are very interesting because on average these teams are only separated by less than one play per game over the last 7 years (UW - 68.2 plays per year; BSU - 69.7 plays per game). What it really tells me is that overall Petersen's offense, which can be a hybrid of shotgun and straight up under center for the QB, is more efficient at what they do and what they do is get defenses off balance by running the ball and passing the ball in great balance more often than not.  In the end it's clear that the thought that Chris Petersen coached offenses are all about slinging the ball all over the field is way off base. What we're likely to see is a coach that gets the most out of what is in front of him. When he had great running backs and not that great QB's he was more run heavy & the exact opposite when the situation was reversed. So, if he comes into Wisconsin and sees that Stave or Bart Houston are going to be able to win games by throwing the ball a bit more than they run, he'll go with that. Same if he thinks the duo of James White and Melvin Gordon are the players that will win him games, he'll run the ball more than he passes to a greater degree. Then there's the fact that little ole Boise State has 18 current NFL players compared to the Badgers 25 - those numbers aren't that far off if you really think about it. Consider this another case of MTB busting a myth. For more on the Badgers coaching search and all other things Bucky make sure to follow us on Twitter @MTBadgers.
Ios_download En_app_rgb_wo_45

Report: Pats employee taking footballs into bathroom on video

Greg Anthony caught offering $80 to undercover officer for sex

Robert Kraft wants apology from NFL if nothing found

NFL may be very close to returning to Los Angeles

Report: Kobe definitely returning next season


Report: Yankees don't want to pay A-Rod home run bonuses

Browner wants Patriots to injure Sherman, Thomas

Report: Rams, other teams interested in Nick Foles

Tom Brady: 'My feelings got hurt' in Deflategate controversy

Odell Beckham Jr. says he played with two hamstring tears

Pete Carroll empathizes with Belichick, Pats in Deflategate

Five key matchups for Super Bowl XLIX

Early B1G predictions for 2015

Remembering Ernie Banks

Allenby rang up $3,400 strip club bill on night of 'kidnapping'

Brady's dad: QB's relationship with Pats 'will end badly'

WATCH: Skittles Super Bowl commercial looks ridiculous

The five best Super Bowl defenses of all time

Mark Brunell explains why he got emotional over Deflategate

NFL was profiting off Marshawn Lynch's crotch grab

NFL finally getting its own YouTube channel

20 most amazing stats in Super Bowl history

Six X-factors who could make an impact in Super Bowl XLIX

College Football News
Delivered to your inbox
You'll also receive Yardbarker's daily Top 10, featuring the best sports stories from around the web. Customize your newsletter to get articles on your favorite sports and teams. And the best part? It's free!

By clicking "Sign Me Up", you have read and agreed to the Fox Sports Digital Privacy Policy and Terms of Use. You can opt out at any time. For more information, please see our Privacy Policy.
Get it now!
Ios_download En_app_rgb_wo_45

Five key matchups for Super Bowl XLIX

Early Big Ten predictions for 2015

Remembering Ernie Banks

Pats employee took footballs into restroom?

Report: Kobe not retiring

More questions about Allenby's story

Yanks don't want to pay A-Rod bonuses

Looking back at Super Bowls 1-48

Super Bowl MVPs through the years

The five best Super Bowl defenses

Burnell explains why he got emotional

NFL was profiting off Lynch's gesture

Today's Best Stuff
For Bloggers

Join the Yardbarker Network for more promotion, traffic, and money.

Company Info
What is Yardbarker?

Yardbarker is the largest network of sports blogs and pro athlete blogs on the web. This site is the hub of the Yardbarker Network, where our editors and algorithms curate the best sports content from our network and beyond.