Originally posted on DraftAce  |  Last updated 2/19/12

As we inch closer to the draft it’s becoming increasingly clear that Ryan Tannehill is going to be a 1st-round pick.

In January, when I finalized my report on Tannehill, I initially gave him a 3rd round grade and expected, due to the premium put on the position, that he would probably come off the board in the 2nd round. But since his consensus grade seems to be much higher, I wanted to go back and take a closer look.

More specifically, I wanted to see Tannehill in situations most comparable to what he’ll face in the NFL. Unfortunately, due to Texas A&M’s schedule I had to go back to the 2011 Sugar Bowl vs LSU to find a defense worthy to truly testing Tannehill, both in terms of coverage in the secondary and pressure with the front seven.

Here are my notes on what stood out [here is the excel sheet with detailed stats on each time he dropped back to throw]

A close look at the 2011 Sugar Bowl gives up some insight into Tannehill's game

Pocket Presence - The first thing that stands out is Tannehill’s willingness to stand in the pocket. Considering his athleticism and the fact that he was a relatively new starter at this stage in his carer, this is impressive. He isn’t afraid to take a hit, and only runs as a last resort. Tannehill was pressured fairly consistently in this game, and while the pressure did force some bad throws, only once did it force him to take off running.

Issues with certain routes - One concern that is raised by his performance in this game is the type of throws on which he struggles. Texas A&M’s offense is fairly conservative by Big 12 standards and is a close match for what he’ll see in the the NFL. As a result, he’s familiar with the type of reads he’ll need to make at the next level. However, he has a tendency - be it by design or choice, only his coaches could tell us that – to shy away from throwing to a moving target. In this game Tannehill rarely threw across the  middle of the field, favoring hitches and hooks and an occasional quick out. When throwing to a moving target, his accuracy is noticeable shaky and it’s possible he consciously avoids these routes. This is of particular concern to teams running the West Coast offense. If he isn’t capable of hitting receivers in stride on quick slants, then he isn’t going to be able to handle that type of scheme.

Handling Pressure – Perhaps the most serious concern that arises from his performance against LSU is his inability to handle pressure. By my count, Tannehill was pressured 10 times. Two resulted in a sack (one was also a fumble), one pass was batted down and on another he was forced to run. That left six aimed passes, two of which he completed. However, the two completed passes were both dump-offs to the running back either at or behind the line of scrimmage. Of the other four passes, all of which were incomplete, only one was accurate (a nice low throw on the run into tight coverage where only his man could reach it).

Accuracy in pocket – When not pressured, Tannehill looked comfortable in the pocket. However, his accuracy was only marginally better. 19 of his 28 passes were on target – a very average number for a guy considered a potential top pick. He has a tendency, even without any pressure, to throw off his back foot which results in high throws. This is fixable, but it also shows up in his 2011 film, so there is still work to be done.

Deep Accuracy – One final concern that presents itself in this game is his inability to find receivers down field. As I already mentioned has favors short routes, and likes to check down when he doesn’t immediately see something open down the field. When he does take a shot deep (15 yards or beyond) he’s erratic. In this game he completed just 3 of 9 passes deep passes, and only four were on target. Two of his throws sailed out of bounds, another was a good three feet over his receivers head and nearly intercepted, and another bounced a good three yards in front of his receiver.

Final Thoughts – After putting this game under the microscope, I have to stick with my initial evaluation of Tannehill. He clearly looks the part, and has the athleticism and pocket presence to play at the next level. However, he is still developing and has too many holes in his game to warrant a 1st-round pick. I will not be surprised if he does develop into a quality starter, but if I’m taking a quarterback in the 1st round I want to be more confident in his ability to lead my franchise for the next decade than I am with Tannehill.

GET THE YARDBARKER APP:
Ios_download En_app_rgb_wo_45
MORE FROM YARDBARKER

Joe Mauer: Concussions blurred vision, affected hitting

LeBron James says Kevin Love-Celtics trade rumor is false

Michael Jordan gifts Kobe Bryant full set of Air Jordans

Bethune-Cookman football player killed at party

Former UFC heavyweight Kevin Randleman dead at 44

WATCH: Chelsea scores three goals in less than 20 minutes

LIKE WHAT YOU SEE?
GET THE DAILY NEWSLETTER:

Broncos safety Shiloh Keo arrested for DUI

Mountain West admits error, says Boise St. shot was good

WATCH: John Calipari loses his mind, gets ejected

Former Clemson star Tajh Boyd to speak at John Kasich rally

Peyton Manning's alleged not-so-wholesome image

Hawks not shopping Al Horford at NBA trade deadline

Michael Jordan gives Kobe Bryant complete set of Air Jordans

Drake has Kentucky edition of custom ‘OVO’ Air Jordan 8s

QUIZ: Name every NBA All-Star Game MVP

Watch rare footage of Stephen Curry from 2001-02 emerges

Check out this custom camouflage Oregon helmet

Ejected John Calipari tweets “they don’t need me and I love it”

Popovich would 'buy ticket' to watch Warriors play

Jamal Murray destroyed South Carolina defender with dunk

WATCH: Lon Kruger gets Oklahoma hoops squad hype for Kansas test

Texas signee glad he didn’t pick Texas A&M after alleged racism

Dallas Stars have passed the early tests in February

Could Matt Forte become the revival for Patriots run game?

Are the Celtics legimate contenders in the East?

College Football News
Delivered to your inbox
You'll also receive Yardbarker's daily Top 10, featuring the best sports stories from around the web. Customize your newsletter to get articles on your favorite sports and teams. And the best part? It's free!

By clicking "Sign Me Up", you have read and agreed to the Fox Sports Digital Privacy Policy and Terms of Use. You can opt out at any time. For more information, please see our Privacy Policy.
the YARDBARKER app
Get it now!
Ios_download En_app_rgb_wo_45

Ranking the ten best free agent pitcher signings

Who had the best NBA All-Star Game of the last 40 years?

The winners and losers of the 2016 MLB offseason

On Kobe Bryant and taking greatness for granted

Bucks need to choose between wins, development

Fantasy booking WrestleMania 32

Unrestricted free agents each team must consider re-signing

QUIZ: Name the winners of the NBA Slam Dunk Contest

Thank you Daniel Bryan

The timeless greatness of Jaromir Jagr

Today's Best Stuff
For Publishers
Company Info
Help
Follow Yardbarker