Found December 05, 2011 on MRISports:
TEAMS:
More than a decade into the BCS era and I am still amazed at the outrage over who is selected to play in the BCS bowls outside of the Championship Game. There is a lot of money on the line for sure, but the fact remains that the other bowls are most often a side show to the big one. Unless there is a year without a clear No. 1, the other games don't matter, no matter what bowl supporters will tell you. Fans get to watch their team one more time (and for some teams -- Illinois, UCLA, Purdue -- this isn't a good thing), and that is it. So when Kansas State was left out of a BCS bowl, and instead is shipped to the Cotton Bowl, it didn't really bother me. After all, the Wildcats were 36th in the MRI. Yes, No. 36. That is out of even "on the bubble" range. The outrage began on Saturday night when there were rumors that Virginia Tech might sneak over Kansas State. It continued through Sunday night and the official announcement. People on Twitter were considering how much they would need to drink in order to make sense of this travesty. Sorry, I don't see the problem. The MRI might be in the minority... or singularity here, but Virginia Tech was much higher in the rankings than Kansas state. Whereas most of the computers had the Wildcats within the top five, the MRI was not so nice. The MRI did agree with the other buckets of bytes on the ranking of Virginia Tech. So why was Kansas State so far off? First let's remember, the MRI utilizes a weighted margin of victory in the rankings. It is an important distinction, and one that makes the BCS computers "inaccurate" in a way. And second, the MRI is the only computer that actually incorporates the performance on the field. Another way to put it is that the MRI looks at the building blocks of the end results: how well an offense did, how well a defense did, how much a team dominated. In a sense, the MRI incorporates the "eye test" without needing to see anything because all of the inputs into a win are part of the formula. And in the eye test, Kansas State loses, big time. Based on the MRI strength of schedule, the two teams are about even. That may seem hard to believe given the difference between the ACC and Big 12 this season. But lost in all the upper level strength of the Big 12 was that Kansas State also played Eastern Kentucky and Kent State, along with Miami. They also got the fun games against Kansas, troublemaker Iowa State and a fading Texas A&M. Virginia Tech's similar weakness was against Appalachian State, East Carolina and Marshall. And then Boston College, Duke and Miami. The one big difference might be that Virginia Tech got to play against Arkansas State, a team that ended up No. 22 in the MRI. The Hokies were one of the two teams that beat the Red Wolves this year (along with Illinois). Nothing here separates the teams clearly. Nothing hears warrants the "Don't ever schedule anyone" cries that come from the doubters. Nothing here is enough to say that Virginia Tech did anything different than Kansas State did, because the Wildcats... they didn't exactly schedule LSU, did they? Next, go back to the margin of victory. Kansas State won two games by more than a touchdown: Kent State and Kansas. That includes just a three-point win by the Wildcats over Eastern Kentucky. The best win by the Wildcats was a 1-point victory over a No. 15 Baylor, followed by a 4-point win over No. 23 Texas. Virginia Tech had seven games that they won by more than a touchdown. The best win was an 11-point win over a No. 21 Georgia Tech, followed by its 26-7 beating of Arkansas State (that is still not ranked, although probably deserves to be and will show that in the bowl game against Northern Illinois. Yes, they are good). If you go further down the list of "inputs" into the MRI, Virginia Tech wins out. Passing offense: Kansas State, 109th; Virginia Tech, 66th Rushing offense: Kansas State, 29th; Virginia Tech, 31st Defense: Kansas State, 74th; Virginia Tech, 13th Turnover differential: Kansas State +13; Virginia Tech, +6 The numbers aren't totally in favor of the Hokies, but Virginia Tech win the head-to-head battles by a wide margin. And if you consider how teams that have a high number of close victories and a turnover differential clearly in their favor are more likely to regress the next season, Kansas State almost lucked into this season. The MRI isn't the end all of computer rankings. It isn't the absolute arbiter of what is correct in college football. But Virginia Tech outperformed the Wildcats this season. That and they bring a lot of fans to bowl games. The Sugar Bowl will not be disappointed in their selection, even if Kansas State fans are.
THE BACKYARD
BEST OF MAXIM
RELATED ARTICLES

BCS Sugar Bowl Offer Worst At-Large Matchup in Series History

Regardless of whether you not you support a rematch between #1 LSU and #2 Alabama, the BCS achieved its primary goal.  The best two teams in the nation are about to square off for the National Championship.  There is room for debate over Alabama’s inclusion in the title game; did Oklahoma State do enough to warrant a chance at the Tigers?  Perhaps so, but from a pure football...

How the Hokies Snuck into BCS

Virginia Tech was blown out twice by Clemson this season and didn't win the ACC championship, yet the Hokies are still going to a BCS bowl. That news began circulating about 90 minutes before the official unveiling Sunday night of the BCS lineup for this bowl season. With SEC teams Alabama and LSU meeting for the national championship, and the BCS rule stating a league can...

Beamer making no apologies for Sugar Bowl date

Virginia Tech coach Frank Beamer is offering no apologies for the No. 17 Hokies date in the Sugar Bowl against Michigan. The Hokies will play the No. 13 Wolverines on Jan. 3 in Louisiana after the selection committee chose them over No. 8 Boise State and No. 11 Kansas State. Beamer says the Hokies (11-2) have won more games than anyone at the Bowl Subdivision level since 1995,...

Beamer defends Hokies' Sugar Bowl spot (AP)

Virginia Tech coach Frank Beamer is well aware that the No. 17 Hokies were one of the most controversial teams included in the BCS bowl lineup, and he has a ready defense of his program. The Hokies will play No. 13 Michigan, another controversial choice, in the Sugar Bowl on Jan. 3 in Louisiana. The selection committee chose them over No.

Virginia Tech coach making no apologies for Sugar Bowl date with Michigan

Virginia Tech coach Frank Beamer is well aware that the No. 17 Hokies were one of the most controversial teams included in the BCS bowl lineup, and he has a ready defense of his program.
College Football News
Delivered to your inbox
You'll also receive Yardbarker's daily Top 10, featuring the best sports stories from around the web. Customize your newsletter to get articles on your favorite sports and teams. And the best part? It's free!

Today's Best Stuff
For Bloggers

Join the Yardbarker Network for more promotion, traffic, and money.

Company Info
Help
What is Yardbarker?

Yardbarker is the largest network of sports blogs and pro athlete blogs on the web. This site is the hub of the Yardbarker Network, where our editors and algorithms curate the best sports content from our network and beyond.