Originally written on World Series Dreaming  |  Last updated 3/26/13
Today the rooftop association threw out a scare tactic (please don’t kill our business) press release. As a part of the press release, the rooftop owners graciously told the Chicago Cubs Rooftops owners release counter offensive, saying Cubs can start rehab of clubhouses, restrooms w/o renegotiating landmark ordinance. — Paul Sullivan (@PWSullivan) March 26, 2013   How gracious of them to give the Ricketts family permission to do whatever they wanted to do with their own product. Of course doing so would be shooting themselves in the foot. Proceeding with the renovation plans before getting final permission from the city would take away any and all leverage the Ricketts family may have, and the rooftop owners know this. While they are correct, that the team can proceed with the first leg in their renovation plans without messing with the landmark status, doing so would put the ball squarely in the rooftop owners court, leaving the Cubs and the Ricketts family squarely behind the 8-ball. How so? If the Cubs move forward with the plan of remodeling the clubhouses and all in stadium they are investing a lot more money in the park making, which means there is even less of a chance they move to a new location. They would practically be throwing money away if they remodeled the clubhouses and did not get complete permission to do the other changes and then decided to move. The rooftop owners know this, and that is why they decided to throw the Cubs that very small bone. However, the Ricketts family and the Cubs might have one more card up their sleeve that may not have been thought of. While I have absolutely no idea what the contract between the Cubs and the rooftops, or how things are worded, there may very well be a loophole in place that can ensure the team can do whatever they please with their ballpark. The Cubs could in fact still put up all the advertising they wanted, without completely blocking the rooftop views of the on field product. The team could install a jumbotron, billboards and whatever else they want. If the rooftops complain or try to sue for the rights to the product, there is a perfectly good counter argument that could be made. Ricketts could add everything they want to add, exactly where they want to add it and telling the rooftop owners to deal with the situation. Obviously, the Ricketts family would have to find a better way to word that in a way which sounds better. Such as, “With the proper work on your end, you still will be able to view our product.” All the rooftop owners would have to do would be to build higher bleachers on their rooftops and they would still be able to view the game. Who knows, perhaps higher bleachers would even give them a better view of the Cubs product. They already invested $50 some million dollars into building up their business in order to pirate the Cubs product, what is a few more million? If any of this is legal, I have no idea. I am not a lawyer, nor do I know what zoning laws say about how high the bleachers can be. But, in theory this is an idea that could possibly have legs. Again, I have no idea if this is even legal with the wording that resides in the contract (if you are a lawyer, or know the law at all, please tell me if this would be possible). This saga is likely far from over, despite the Ricketts family’s April 1st deadline.  In the end, one of two things will need to happen. Either Tom Ricketts is going to have to make a significant contribution to Alderman Tom Tunney’s campaign fund or Mayor Rahm Emanuel is going to have to get involved and go over Tunney ‘s head; which he is able to do, he just wants the Cubs and the rooftops to come to an agreement. With the press release from the rooftops though, an agreement seems to still be very far off.
GET THE YARDBARKER APP:
Ios_download En_app_rgb_wo_45
MORE FROM YARDBARKER

Mets acquire Yoenis Cespedes from Tigers

Sheldon Richardson escapes felony charges for recent arrest

Lawyer who litigated against NFL: Brady plays every game

Cowboys should sign interested RB Steven Jackson

Jameis Winston confirmed as Buccaneers starting QB

LIKE WHAT YOU SEE?
GET THE DAILY NEWSLETTER:

Russell Wilson contract increases likelihood of change

Jim Harbaugh doesn’t care if he’s popular

Johnny Manziel struggles in first day of Browns camp

Report: Wilson, Seahawks agree to four-year, $86.7M contract

Report: Former Jets exec leaked false Deflategate info to ESPN

Belichick on sticking it to NFL: 'Really not very important to me'

Padres don’t sell at trade deadline, reportedly because AJ Preller still believes in team

First photos of Jason Pierre-Paul’s injured hand emerge

Stop kvetching about Notre Dame, please

Rebuttal banner supporting Tom Brady flies over Pats practice

Ranking the NFL’s 32 head coaches

LeSean McCoy cancels party, but it wasn't some 'weird orgy'

Redskins making huge mistake by signing Junior Galette

New Blue Jay David Price got a flat tire on his way to Toronto

Five of the worst baseball trades since 2000

Famed ballboy Red Lightning spotted at Falcons camp

Rickie Fowler aces final hole, treats media to free beers

SEC remains college football's best conference

MLB News
Delivered to your inbox
You'll also receive Yardbarker's daily Top 10, featuring the best sports stories from around the web. Customize your newsletter to get articles on your favorite sports and teams. And the best part? It's free!

By clicking "Sign Me Up", you have read and agreed to the Fox Sports Digital Privacy Policy and Terms of Use. You can opt out at any time. For more information, please see our Privacy Policy.
the YARDBARKER app
Get it now!
Ios_download En_app_rgb_wo_45

Mets acquire Cespedes from Tigers

Ranking the NFL’s 32 head coaches

Five worst baseball trades since 2000

Examining the state of the NFL

Puig: Broke out of slump by playing baseball video games

Braves dump risk, exchange it for risk

David Price traded to Blue Jays

The indefensible Hulk Hogan

Cole Hamels chose Rangers over Astros

Can Preller fix the mess in San Diego?

Next summer's top 10 NBA free agents

Who is the NL's new top shortstop?

Today's Best Stuff
For Publishers
Company Info
Help
Follow Yardbarker