Yardbarker
Yardbarker
x
The most memorable and infamous box office bombs
Universal Pictures

The most memorable and infamous box office bombs

It’s always unfortunate when a film bombs. Well, it’s usually unfortunate. Sometimes a movie just gets on your nerves and when it does a belly flop you can’t help but smirk a little. These movies have upended careers and done serious damage to studios. We aren’t just talking critical flops, here. We’re talking movies that tanked it at the box office despite plenty of budget and marketing. No tiny indies need apply here. We’re punching up, way up, with our list of the biggest and most memorable box office bombs.

 
1 of 25

“Waterworld” (1995)

“Waterworld” (1995)
Universal

Let’s start with the infamous bomb that…was kind of not a bomb? Make no mistake, “Waterworld” was a bad movie. Kevin Costner began the process of spending a lot of his goodwill he earned from “Dances With Wolves.” Also, at the time this was the most-expensive movie ever made. In the United States, it did flop, but thanks to a good performance overseas, and unexpected popularity on VHS, it did turn a profit. That being said, when you make the priciest movie ever “Barely make a profit” is not the end goal.

 
2 of 25

“Mortal Engines” (2018)

“Mortal Engines” (2018)
Universal

Peter Jackson knows how to turn a book into a huge hit movie. Well, at least when hobbits and elves are involved. What about a movie based on a steampunk world where cities move around on cogs and gears? Jackson was one of the screenwriters on this movie, but apparently there weren’t enough fans of the book. Reportedly, “Mortal Engines” lost its studio a stunning $174 million. By some measures, that makes it the biggest bomb of all time just based on sheer numbers.

 
3 of 25

“Cutthroat Island” (1995)

“Cutthroat Island” (1995)
MGM

If you want the true biggest bomb of 1995, you need to look here. Heck, it’s even another water-heavy movie. This was not the year for seafaring, evidently. Renny Harlin directed his then-wife Geena Davis in this pirate adventure, but nobody was happy with it. It made only $10 million in the box office, and may have killed its production company Carolco Pictures.

 
4 of 25

“The Lone Ranger” (2013)

“The Lone Ranger” (2013)
Disney

Johnny Depp playing Tonto. Who could have figured this was going to go wrong? Evidently people weren’t digging the idea of Armie Hammer as a movie star. Indeed, it hasn’t happened for him yet, despite his clear talent. While it did get a couple of Oscar nominations – for visual effects and makeup, it barely made more than its budget. When you factor in marketing costs for a Disney movie, well…

 
5 of 25

“The Adventures of Pluto Nash” (2002)

“The Adventures of Pluto Nash” (2002)
Warner Bros.

Fun fact: Eddie Murphy used to be a huge movie star. That stopped being the case around the time of “The Adventures of Pluto Nash.” Critics hated it and so did filmgoers apparently. Well, at least the ones who actually went to go see it. “Pluto Nash” flopped, and Murphy’s career has never been the same. And yet, somehow “Norbit” still feels like the nadir of his career.

 
6 of 25

“John Carter” (2012)

“John Carter” (2012)
Walt Disney

“John Carter from Mars” is a somewhat intriguing title. When you cut the “from Mars” part of that, you end up with an incredibly generic title. That might work for  Oscar bait like “Michael Clayton,” but trying to get people to flock to see a blockbuster simply called “John Carter?” It didn’t work. How many people didn’t even realize this was a sci-fi movie with space travel in it? Maybe that would have made it more money?

 
7 of 25

“Heaven’s Gate” (1980)

“Heaven’s Gate” (1980)
United Artists

Michael Cimino basically got a blank check after “The Deer Hunter” won Best Picture. United Artists would come to regret that. Cimino’s film was a mess behind the scenes and its budget ballooned to staggering numbers for the time. When it hit theaters, it made a mere $3.5 million. Even in 1980, that was terrible. United Artists basically went out of business, and you could argue that “Heaven’s Gate” ended the era of the ‘70s auteur filmmaker.

 
8 of 25

“How Do You Know” (2010)

“How Do You Know” (2010)
Columbia

How does a middling romantic comedy end up with a budget of $120 million. Well, when your cast includes Reese Witherspoon, Owen Wilson, Paul Rudd, and Jack Nicholson. In fact, this is – to date – Nicholson’s last acting role. James L. Brooks used to be a crowd-pleasing filmmaker. For “How Do You Know,” there was barely a crowd to please.

 
9 of 25

“Terminator: Dark Fate” (2019)

“Terminator: Dark Fate” (2019)
20th Century Fox

Linda Hamilton and Arnold Schwarzenegger back in their most-iconic roles. James Cameron back producing and working on the story. Would this be the movie that returned the “Terminator” franchise to glory? No, it turns out. People basically shrugged at the film, which didn’t make its budget back. There had been plans for more “Terminator” movies. Now there isn’t.

 
10 of 25

“The Postman” (1997)

“The Postman” (1997)
Warner Bros.

If you want the true Costner bomb, it’s “The Postman.” Costner starred and directed this nearly-three-hour post-apocalyptic epic about, well, a postman delivering mail. Critics panned it, and it only made $20 million in the theaters. This time, there would be no VHS Renaissance either.

 
11 of 25

“Battlefield Earth” (2000)

“Battlefield Earth” (2000)
Warner Bros.

Of all the bombs on this list, this was the easiest one to call. A big-budget adaptation of an incomprehensible novel by L. Ron Hubbard, the founder of Scientology? Starring John Travolta, one of the biggest names in Scientology? One look at the trailer let you know this movie was going to be terrible. It won seven Razzies when it came out, and ended up winning Worst Film of the Decade as well. Needless to say, it didn’t make its budget back.

 
12 of 25

“Evan Almighty” (2007)

“Evan Almighty” (2007)
Columbia

“Bruce Almighty” was a huge hit, and Steve Carell was a rising star. He had a small role in “Bruce Almighty,” but that was a Jim Carrey film. Still, we knew that Carell could carry a production. Just look at “The 40-Year-Old Virgin” and “The Office.” No Carrey, though, seemed to kill people’s interest. “Evan Almighty,” a riff on Noah’s Ark, fell just short of making back its budget.

 
13 of 25

“Jupiter Ascending” (2015)

“Jupiter Ascending” (2015)
Warner Bros.

We’re a long way from “The Matrix” changing the world. Since then, the Wachowskis have failed to make a single film that really satisfied people. Sure, there have been some financial successes, but critics have been out on the Wachowskis. For “Jupiter Ascending,” critics, fans, and the box office all told the same story. This insane tale involving rocket boots and Eddie Redmayne eating every last morsel of scenery was a pure and simple flop.

 
14 of 25

“Around the World in 80 Days” (2004)

“Around the World in 80 Days” (2004)
Walt Disney

In 1956, an adaptation of “Around the World in 80 Days” won Best Picture. It shouldn’t have, but it was clearly not a flop. The 2004 version, though, was a slog that was met with a shrug of apathy. Starring Jackie Chan and Steve Coogan, the Disney film still managed to barely make a dent in the box office, especially in the United States. They should have just let this story stay un-rebooted.

 
15 of 25

“Ballistic: Ecks vs. Sever” (2002)

“Ballistic: Ecks vs. Sever” (2002)
Warnos Bros.

This movie has a hilarious name, but beyond that it had nothing going for it. In fact, Rotten Tomatoes once named “Ballistic: Ecks vs. Sever” the worst movie of all time. Nobody cared to see it either, as it didn’t come close to making back its $70 million budget.

 
16 of 25

“Gigli” (2003)

“Gigli” (2003)
Sony

You know the story here. Ben Affleck and Jennifer Lopez were a couple, but people were pretty sick of them. Oh, and “Gigli” was also a terrible movie. It wasn’t all “Bennifer” backlash that made this a flop. Martin Brest had directed hits like “Beverly Hills Cop” and “Midnight Run.” He never directed another movie after “Gigli.”

 
17 of 25

“R.I.P.D.” (2013)

“R.I.P.D.” (2013)
Universal

A movie starring Jeff Bridges and Ryan Reynolds as dead people in charge of keeping their fellow souls from fleeing the afterlife? Not a terrible idea for a movie. Unfortunately, the execution was awful. The film isn’t funny, and nobody was happy with it. It takes a lot of special effects to make a movie like this, which is a big reason why the movie had a big budget that it couldn’t make back.

 
18 of 25

“Tomorrowland” (2015)

“Tomorrowland” (2015)
Walt Disney

Do you even remember that “Tomorrowland” came out? Has a movie with this much ostensible clout ever made less of an impact? Brad Bird was directing a movie written by Damon Lindelof starring George Clooney based on an attraction at Disneyland. The marketing was ubiquitous, but the film came and went without making any noise. It made a decent amount of money in the box office, but “Tomorrowland” was expected to be a huge hit. Instead, it barely made back its massive $190 budget before factoring in those marketing costs.

 
19 of 25

“Ishtar” (1987)

“Ishtar” (1987)
Columbia

“Ishtar” has a reputation as the worst movie ever, and that’s unfair. It’s actually perfectly a fine, a solid B- or a C+. Unfortunately, the movie had a huge budget and huge stars in Warren Beatty and Dustin Hoffman. That got the rumors churning, so when the movie wasn’t a hit, the backlash began. “Ishtar” was a big bomb, as it barely made over $14 million. Unfortunately, that hurt the career of director Elaine May.

 
20 of 25

“Hudson Hawk” (1991)

“Hudson Hawk” (1991)
Columbia

Bruce Willis’ fingerprints are all over “Hudson Hawk.” He didn’t just star in it. He co-wrote it and made the theme song. The return of Bruno, indeed. “Hudson Hawk” was an absolute failure, and it’s considered one of the worst movies ever. Unlike “Ishtar,” its reputation has not been reconsidered at all. Overseas success saved the film from being a horrible flop, but it only made $17 million in the United States.

 
21 of 25

“Fantastic Four” (2015)

“Fantastic Four” (2015)
Marvel

Comic book movies are huge. Marvel characters are in some of the biggest movies ever. Surely, a Fantastic Four movie could hit it big, right? Nope! Josh Trank’s movie landed with a thud. Trank had been a rising director, but he ended up in director jail for a bit after “Fantastic Four” proved a dull affair that was somehow worse than the “Fantastic Four” movies with Jessica Alba and Chris Evans.

 
22 of 25

“Krull” (1983)

“Krull” (1983)
Columbia

“Krull” has no stars and is not based on any known characters. So how did it end up with a budget that ballooned to around $30 million? Script revisions and set changes, evidently. There was hope to make “Krull” a sci-fi hit for Columbia. Instead, it couldn’t make back its budget. The film is now a cult movie, but that doesn’t stop it from being a bomb.

 
23 of 25

“Green Lantern” (2011)

“Green Lantern” (2011)
Warner Bros.

Sorry, Ryan Reynolds. We’re double dipping on you. “Green Lantern” did lead Reynolds to a relationship with Blake Lively, which is nice for them. It also made him a punchline and put a real crimp in him as a movie star. Of course, nobody has made “Green Lantern” a bigger punchline than Reynolds himself. Just watch a “Deadpool” movie sometime.

 
24 of 25

“Dark Phoenix” (2019)

“Dark Phoenix” (2019)
Marvel

The first “X-Men” movies in this series, the revamped version with James McAvoy and Michael Fassbender, were successful. “Dark Phoenix” decidedly was not. The movie had a massive budget of $200 million, but people were seemingly tired of the X-Men, and didn’t have any interest in seeing the Dark Phoenix story again. By some measures “Dark Phoenix” was the biggest bomb of 2019, and it ended plans for this to be the start of a new trilogy. The “X-Men” films are dead.

 
25 of 25

“Solo: A Star Wars Story” (2018)

“Solo: A Star Wars Story” (2018)
Walt Disney

“Star Wars” movies print money, right? There was a reason that they seemed to have plans to release a new one every year. In addition to the trilogy built around Rey and Kylo Ren, they were releasing these “Star Wars Story” movies. “Rogue One” was a critical and commercial success. Now they were making a movie about Han Solo, maybe people’s favorite “Star Wars” character. The critics, and fans, were lukewarm at best on “Solo.” It’s the lowest-grossing live-action “Star Wars” movie and the first to be considered a commercial failure. Suddenly, the plans for an annual “Star Wars” movie were over.

Chris Morgan

Chris Morgan is a Detroit-based culture writer who has somehow managed to justify getting his BA in Film Studies. He has written about sports and entertainment across various internet platforms for years and is also the author of three books about '90s television.

More must-reads:

Customize Your Newsletter

Yardbarker +

Get the latest news and rumors, customized to your favorite sports and teams. Emailed daily. Always free!

TODAY'S BEST

All signs point to Yankees moving on from Anthony Volpe
MLB

All signs point to Yankees moving on from Anthony Volpe

With the trade for Ryan McMahon now complete, it would seem New York Yankees’ general manager Brian Cashman has fulfilled one of his three priorities. He can now cross third base off the list, which leaves the rotation and bullpen as his remaining priorities. However, according to one Yankees writer, Cashman might not be done with the infield. Chris Kirschner of The Athletic reported this after the McMahon trade: “The Yankees may not be done adding to their infield. A team source said the Yankees are interested in adding a right-handed hitter who could play the infield.” Kirschner adds that the Yankees have had interest in Willi Castro and Amed Rosario. But the question now is, how would another player fit into the Yankees’ infield? Needless to say, Paul Goldschmidt and Jazz Chisholm Jr. aren’t going anywhere, and McMahon is just getting there. That leaves the low-hanging fruit. Anthony Volpe has been at the center of controversy all this season. His 13 errors, many of which had come at make-or-break moments, amount to the second-highest total in the game. In addition, his bat has not been able to compensate, hitting .214/.286/.407 with 14 home runs. There was always a lot to like about Volpe. He won a Gold Glove in his rookie year, his power has always been promising and his speed is nothing to scoff at. Unfortunately, his glove has become a liability, and his speed has also produced very few results. Volpe has swiped just 10 bags in 17 attempts. His power is the one thing that still has some upside, but it hasn’t been enough to justify a spot in the lineup. Both Castro and Rosario have been far more productive at the plate this season than Volpe. Kirschner doesn’t clarify how serious the Yankees are in their pursuit of another infielder, but that most likely isn’t available information. Having just turned 24, Volpe could still become the type of player that was expected from him as a top prospect. However, his recent performance has weighed heavily on his team’s efforts, and it may be buying him a ticket out of the Bronx — or at least a spot on the bench.

Celtics Rumors: Damian Lillard, Neemias Queta, Ben Simmons
NBA

Celtics Rumors: Damian Lillard, Neemias Queta, Ben Simmons

Damian Lillard was briefly linked to the Celtics after being waived and stretched by the Bucks, but that possibility came and went quicker than a Jrue Holiday text. Turns out Holiday did shoot his shot. “As soon as I was waived … he sent me the eyeball emoji,” Lillard said at his introductory presser in Portland. “I already knew where I was pivoting to when he sent it, but I didn’t want to say nothing too soon, so here we are.” “Here” is back in a Trail Blazers uniform. And while Lillard isn’t expected to play this season as he recovers from a torn Achilles, the idea of him as a long-term Jayson Tatum insurance policy briefly crossed Boston’s radar. That was about as far as it got. As MassLive’s Brian Robb wrote, the Celtics never had the financial path to compete with Portland’s three-year, $42 million offer. Boston only has the $5.7M taxpayer MLE to work with — and using that might’ve meant shedding some other salary just to stay under the second apron. Who’s starting at center? In a new mailbag, Robb projects Neemias Queta as the likely starting center if the roster stays put. That would give Boston a lineup of Queta, Jaylen Brown, and Derrick White, with the last two spots up for grabs. Payton Pritchard vs. Anfernee Simons at point guard? Sam Hauser vs. Georges Niang at forward? Maybe Josh Minott sneaks into the mix? Yeah, it’s July. But hey, the debates have begun. No Davison, slim Simmons ddds Boston officially parted ways with JD Davison this week, ending a three-year run with the former second-round pick. According to Robb, the team just didn’t see NBA-level growth. And what about that open roster spot? Ben Simmons is out there. But Robb pegs the odds of Simmons landing in Boston at just 10-20 percent, mainly because he’s expected to get better money (and probably a bigger role) elsewhere. More NBA News Rumors

White Sox asking Mets for promising slugger in potential Luis Robert trade
MLB

White Sox asking Mets for promising slugger in potential Luis Robert trade

The New York Mets appear to be clicking again, entering Sunday night's game with the San Francisco Giants on a six-game winning streak. This hot stretch has raised the stakes for David Stearns and company ahead of this week's trade deadline; Stearns has already filled one need, landing lefty reliever Gregory Soto from Baltimore, and could be looking to make a few more moves prior to Thursday. One of the more prominent rumors surrounding the Mets is their interest in Chicago White Sox center fielder Luis Robert Jr., who is having a down year but was an All-Star as recently as 2023. Robert is hitting well right now and has a market, which has led the White Sox to demand a high price from the Mets in trade talks for him. USA Today's Bob Nightengale addressed the Robert trade talks in his Sunday column and mentioned that the White Sox are seeking to acquire Mark Vientos from the Mets in any version of a Robert trade. Vientos, who got off to a cold start to the season, has hit well over the past two weeks, batting .290 with a .732 OPS in 31 at-bats. Robert has also peaked in the month of July, hitting .351 with two home runs, nine RBI, and a .982 OPS in 37 at-bats. While this is admittedly a small sample size, it does offer hope to prospective buyers that Robert can recapture some of his All-Star form with a change of scenery away from the hopeless losing that has consumed the White Sox since the start of the 2024 campaign. Since there are so few center fielders available on the trade market, Chicago has multiple suitors for Robert, who also has two team options for the next two seasons and is still just 27 years old. Setting the Mets' asking price at Vientos indicates the White Sox aren't planning to settle for just minor leaguers as part of a Robert package, which could be richer than what the Mets want to pay right now. While the Mets have the potential to move one of their surplus infielders for a roster upgrade, it doesn't feel like Stearns would want to give up on Vientos, who was one of the team's most dominant hitters in the postseason a year ago, for potentially two months of Robert. Vientos may be best suited to be a designated hitter on the current roster, but he has elite power potential and is under team control through the 2029 season. If the White Sox don't lower the price off of Vientos for a trade, it is possible the Mets look elsewhere to address center field. Other trade options could include Baltimore's Cedric Mullins and a reunion with Harrison Bader, who the Twins will look to shop, while Drew Gilbert's hot July at Triple-A Syracuse offers another internal possibility for the position.

Steelers Rookie Will Howard Reveals 1 Problem He Has With Aaron Rodgers
NFL

Steelers Rookie Will Howard Reveals 1 Problem He Has With Aaron Rodgers

The Pittsburgh Steelers' brass is hoping that the whole team can learn a thing or two from new quarterback Aaron Rodgers during the 2025 season. Some players have already been raving about the wealth of knowledge that he has been giving to his teammates during the little bit of time that he has been at the facilities for. The idea is that even though he is a bridge quarterback, his mentorship can lead to Pittsburgh reaching the next level under him and for a few years afterwards as well. Will Howard has been the most vocal with praising Rodgers. However, he told Brian Batko of one particular issue he has with him and the main "downside" with being on a team with him. "Howard admitted there’s a downside to it, however," Batko wrote. "Sometimes, he just has to look away when Rodgers makes a certain throw because it reminds him that his arm talent isn’t quite at that level." There is a big difference between the two players. Rodgers has won four MVPs and a Super Bowl. Meanwhile, Howard was a sixth-round pick after just one notable season in college football, even though he won the National Championship. There is a lot for the rookie to learn from the 41-year-old, and that includes watching him make big-league throws that he has yet to even try. Batko explained exactly the kind of throws that Rodgers has been making that has humbled Howard in training camp so far. "There was one moment Friday when Rodgers subtly lowered his arm angle to avoid a leaping Keeanu Benton — trying to get his hands up for a batted pass — and fit the ball into a window to rookie running back Kaleb Johnson over the middle," Batko noted. "Rodgers also had one of his classic off-the-back-foot tosses to Darnell Washington after a play-fake." There is not much that Rodgers has not seen or done in his career. The Steelers are hoping he can take some of that experience and utilize it with whatever he has left in the tank for the 2025 season, even if it means reminding Howard that he has a long way to go in development. Being a starting-caliber quarterback in the NFL is a struggle in the first place, let alone being a perennial MVP. Steelers Are Looking For Howard To Learn And Develop Quicker Thanks To Rodgers Of course, Howard didn't mean those comments to be rude or obnoxious. He is still praising his mentor for the different kind of passes that he can still make. He never had to drop his arm angle to get by the defender with a sidearm throw, but now he can learn to do add that to his repertoire and use that to try and win a starting job somewhere later on in his career. Howard has already been impressing the fans at training camp, as he has quickly become a fan favorite. He appears to be a lock to make the 53-man roster, even if he would be kept as the third-string emergency quarterback. He will have the whole season to watch, learn, develop, and pick Rodgers' brain. Knowing him, he could even keep asking the veteran questions after he leaves the team. Depending on where the Steelers draft in 2026, Howard could have a realistic chance at winning the starting job that year. Everyone knows that they want a franchise quarterback in the first round, but depending on where they fall in the draft compared to other passer-needy teams, they could end up passing on that position for another year. That would give the 2025 sixth-round pick a chance to prove himself to his peers and his coaches.