Originally written on Awful Announcing  |  Last updated 11/14/14
Back in November, we brought you the news of the Los Angeles Dodgers and their potential $6 billion, 25 year TV deal with Fox. But here we are in 2013, and the deal has still not been finalized. As time continues to roll on, the Dodgers may be going in a different direction from Fox, and could actually ink a deal with Time Warner instead. Fox lost their exclusive negotiating rights with the Dodgers five weeks ago, and since then, Time Warner has stepped in to the discussions as well. The reason for the Dodgers opening up negotiations has to do with the versatility that Time Warner can provide the club. Guggenheim Partners, new principal owners of the team among others, also own Dick Clark Productions. A deal with Time Warner could also help that asset out with distribution, whereas a deal with Fox would only benefit the Dodgers. The proposed Fox deal is also interesting because of the way it was set up. Under MLB's revenue sharing agreement, 34% of a team's annual rights fee must be thrown into the pool. In the $6 billion agreement the Dodgers and Fox were discussing, you'd think that the Dodgers would have to pay in $2 billion over the 25 years... until looking at the way things were set up. The Dodgers/Fox deal only had an annual rights fee of $84 million per season, increasing by 4% each year. The deal also contained $100 million per year in dividends that would be paid to the team, and that money is where the discrepancy comes into play.  The main issue at play is ownership in a potential RSN with Fox or Time Warner. With the Dodgers planning on launching their own RSN, the league believes the team must have an ownership stake in it for the $100 million dividend to not be subject to revenue sharing. Without Dodgers ownership in the RSN, the dividend would be subject to revenue sharing, costing the team an additional $34 million per season in addition to the 34% of the rights fees they're contributing. Most of the RSNs that have popped up in recent months and years (including CSN Bay Area, CSN Houston, CSN Philadelphia, SNY, YES, NESN, MASN, etc) have at least partial ownership by the teams involved. However, there are some (the Root Sports RSNs in Pittsburgh, Denver, and Seattle to name three) that have no team ownership. Predictably, the teams that don't have any ownership in their RSNs are bringing in much less revenue per year. If the Dodgers are forced to take an ownership role in their new RSN in order to get that $100 million dividend free from revenue sharing restrictions, it will be a huge coup for them, and will essentially confirm that their new TV deal is the new high watermark in sports. However, if the team doesn't want to take an ownership role, and that dividend is subject to revenue sharing, the league as a whole may be better off with an extra $34 million thrown into the pool yearly. Whatever the decision ends up being, it will be a key ruling for other teams who are seeing their rights agreements expire in the next couple of years. If the Dodgers don't need to have ownership in the RSN to get that dividend, ownership may not matter as much.  And for that matter, if the team *is* forced to have a partial stake in the RSN to have their dividends exempt from revenue sharing, why wouldn't every team that has rights agreements expiring try to start up a new RSN that they have a stake in? Whatever the outcome of the Dodgers TV negotiations ends up being, things are going to definitively change in the future. [LA Times]
MORE FROM YARDBARKER

Jameis Winston cleared in code of conduct case

Sherman: Patrick Peterson would be benched on Seahawks

Fans struck by lightning after Buccaneers-Packers game

Report: Philip Rivers playing through painful back injury

Report: Bears could have interest in Jim Harbaugh

Report: Shanahan interested in coaching next season

LIKE WHAT YOU SEE?
GET THE DAILY NEWSLETTER:

Report: Michigan has its eye on several NFL coaches

Report: Titans, Jay Cutler have mutual interest in trade

Phillies GM told Ryan Howard team is better off without him

Report: Browns interested in drafting Marcus Mariota

Chargers keep playoff hopes alive with comeback win

Robin Lopez responds to Khloe Kardashian dating rumors

WATCH: Three players ejected after Giants-Rams fight

WATCH: Dominic Raiola stomps on Bears player's ankle

WATCH: Arian Foster throws TD pass, drops scoreboard taunt

WATCH: Johnny Manziel leaves with injury after taking big hit

NHL has warned 22 players about diving

Nick Mangold wears NYDP hat to honor fallen officers

Five things we learned from the first day of bowl games

WATCH: South Alabama coach bloodied after kick to the face

Dan Mullen wears funny 'Christmas Vacation' sweater

WATCH: Redskins FB gets in Eagles fan's face after TD

WATCH: Utah runs trick play on first offensive play of game

Mick Cronin misses game with unruptured aneurysm

MLB News
Delivered to your inbox
You'll also receive Yardbarker's daily Top 10, featuring the best sports stories from around the web. Customize your newsletter to get articles on your favorite sports and teams. And the best part? It's free!

By clicking "Sign Me Up", you have read and agreed to the Fox Sports Digital Privacy Policy and Terms of Use. You can opt out at any time. For more information, please see our Privacy Policy.

Raiola stomps on Bears player's ankle

Bears interested in Jim Harbaugh?

Shanahan to return to 2015?

Browns interested in drafting Mariota?

Mullen wears funny Christmas sweater

RG3 returning to Redskins?

Tom Izzo hot after bad loss

Kings, Nets talking Deron Williams trade

WATCH: DeSean mocks Eagles

Vick: Winston is the future of the NFL

No NFL team in LA next season?

UNC rocking Jordan-era throwbacks

Today's Best Stuff
For Bloggers

Join the Yardbarker Network for more promotion, traffic, and money.

Company Info
Help
What is Yardbarker?

Yardbarker is the largest network of sports blogs and pro athlete blogs on the web. This site is the hub of the Yardbarker Network, where our editors and algorithms curate the best sports content from our network and beyond.